Change in metaphorical framing: Metaphors of TRADE in 225 years of State of the Union addresses (1790-2014)

C.F. Burgers, Kathleen Ahrens

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The literature provides diverging perspectives on the universality and stability of economic metaphors over time. This article contains a diachronic analysis of economic metaphors describing trade in a corpus of 225 years of US State of the Union addresses (1790-2014). We focused on two types of change: (1) replacement of a source domain by another domain and (2) change in mapping within a source domain. In our corpus, five source domains of trade were predominant: (a) PHYSICAL OBJECT, (b) BUILDING, (c) CONTAINER, (d) JOURNEY and (e) LIVING BEING. Only the relative frequency of the CONTAINER source domain was related to time. Additionally, mappings between source and target domains were mostly stable. Nevertheless, our analyses suggest that the TRADE metaphors in our corpus are related to concreteness in a more nuanced way as typically assumed in Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Metaphors high in the concreteness dimension of physicality and low in the concreteness dimension of specificity are likeliest to be used over longer time periods, by providing communicators with freedom to adjust the metaphor to changing societal circumstances.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)260-279
Number of pages20
JournalApplied Linguistics
Volume41
Issue number2
Early online date13 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2020

Funding

FundersFunder number
Hong Kong University Grants CouncilGRF #1210014
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek275-89-020, 040-11-604
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

    Keywords

    • Metaphor
    • Diachronic analysis
    • Economic discourse
    • Political communication
    • State of the Union

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Change in metaphorical framing: Metaphors of TRADE in 225 years of State of the Union addresses (1790-2014)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this