Changed priorities ahead: Journalists’ shifting role perceptions when covering public health crises

Celine Klemm*, Enny Das, Tilo Hartmann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

253 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Journalistic role perceptions have been extensively studied in general contexts, but little is known as to how roles – or role prioritization – may shift across contexts, and professional characteristics. The aim of this study was gaining an understanding of journalists’ changing role perceptions in health crisis coverage, and moreover to examine potential differences between general and specialist reporters. We conducted 22 in-depth interviews with reporters with experience in health crisis reporting in Germany and Finland. Findings suggest that journalists’ roles shift when covering health crises (versus non-crises), towards a role as public mobilizers, towards classifying risks and from a watchdog to a more co-operative role. Furthermore, professional characteristics matter in journalists’ understanding and performance of their roles. Specialist reporters appear better equipped to deal with the challenges of health crisis coverage, such as balancing remaining critical with co-operation with authorities in their efforts to contain crises. Specialist reporters are also less likely to get swayed by the panic often accompanying health crises than general reporters are.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1223-1241
Number of pages19
JournalJournalism
Volume20
Issue number9
Early online date1 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Keywords

  • Crisis coverage
  • epidemic
  • expert interview
  • health emergency
  • health journalism
  • public health
  • role perceptions

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Changed priorities ahead: Journalists’ shifting role perceptions when covering public health crises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this