Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention

Erik Van der Burg, John Cass, Jan Theeuwes

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this study we investigated under what conditions motion direction changes pop out in continuously moving target/distractor environments. Participants were presented with vertically oriented Gabor patches whose carrier components drifted at a constant speed from left to right and then reversed direction. On any given trial, one of these elements was nominated as the target and the remaining elements were distractors. Distractor elements all changed direction simultaneously. The distractors either moved in a homogeneous manner (i.e. all moved in the same direction), or in a heterogeneous manner (i.e. direction was randomized). The target moved with a similar spatio-temporal trajectory as the distractors from left to right (or vice versa), but changed direction asynchronously with respect to the distracting elements. The participants’ task was to locate this deviant (target) Gabor patch. We show that a motion direction change pops out (as indicated by the absence of a set size effect) when the surrounding distractors move in a homogeneous direction. When the distractors moved in heterogenous directions, a similar pop out effect was observed when the set size was small (≤5 elements), but not when it was large. This suggests that motion direction changes capture attention only when the change results in a unique direction of motion. Consistent with this finding we also show that a moving target (without direction change) captures attention in cases in which all distractors recently changed direction. This corroborates the idea that, in addition to direction cues, the temporal uniqueness of a change in an object's direction (or absence, thereof) relative to surrounding objects is a cue capable of capturing attention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-63
Number of pages10
JournalVision research
Volume165
Early online date23 Oct 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

Direction compound
Cues

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Attentional capture
  • Motion
  • Vision
  • Visual search

Cite this

@article{268ac9dc52d24ea798c8b6cd24e26c9d,
title = "Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention",
abstract = "In this study we investigated under what conditions motion direction changes pop out in continuously moving target/distractor environments. Participants were presented with vertically oriented Gabor patches whose carrier components drifted at a constant speed from left to right and then reversed direction. On any given trial, one of these elements was nominated as the target and the remaining elements were distractors. Distractor elements all changed direction simultaneously. The distractors either moved in a homogeneous manner (i.e. all moved in the same direction), or in a heterogeneous manner (i.e. direction was randomized). The target moved with a similar spatio-temporal trajectory as the distractors from left to right (or vice versa), but changed direction asynchronously with respect to the distracting elements. The participants’ task was to locate this deviant (target) Gabor patch. We show that a motion direction change pops out (as indicated by the absence of a set size effect) when the surrounding distractors move in a homogeneous direction. When the distractors moved in heterogenous directions, a similar pop out effect was observed when the set size was small (≤5 elements), but not when it was large. This suggests that motion direction changes capture attention only when the change results in a unique direction of motion. Consistent with this finding we also show that a moving target (without direction change) captures attention in cases in which all distractors recently changed direction. This corroborates the idea that, in addition to direction cues, the temporal uniqueness of a change in an object's direction (or absence, thereof) relative to surrounding objects is a cue capable of capturing attention.",
keywords = "Attention, Attentional capture, Motion, Vision, Visual search",
author = "{Van der Burg}, Erik and John Cass and Jan Theeuwes",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.008",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "54--63",
journal = "Vision research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention. / Van der Burg, Erik; Cass, John; Theeuwes, Jan.

In: Vision research, Vol. 165, 01.12.2019, p. 54-63.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes (but not differences) in motion direction fail to capture attention

AU - Van der Burg, Erik

AU - Cass, John

AU - Theeuwes, Jan

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - In this study we investigated under what conditions motion direction changes pop out in continuously moving target/distractor environments. Participants were presented with vertically oriented Gabor patches whose carrier components drifted at a constant speed from left to right and then reversed direction. On any given trial, one of these elements was nominated as the target and the remaining elements were distractors. Distractor elements all changed direction simultaneously. The distractors either moved in a homogeneous manner (i.e. all moved in the same direction), or in a heterogeneous manner (i.e. direction was randomized). The target moved with a similar spatio-temporal trajectory as the distractors from left to right (or vice versa), but changed direction asynchronously with respect to the distracting elements. The participants’ task was to locate this deviant (target) Gabor patch. We show that a motion direction change pops out (as indicated by the absence of a set size effect) when the surrounding distractors move in a homogeneous direction. When the distractors moved in heterogenous directions, a similar pop out effect was observed when the set size was small (≤5 elements), but not when it was large. This suggests that motion direction changes capture attention only when the change results in a unique direction of motion. Consistent with this finding we also show that a moving target (without direction change) captures attention in cases in which all distractors recently changed direction. This corroborates the idea that, in addition to direction cues, the temporal uniqueness of a change in an object's direction (or absence, thereof) relative to surrounding objects is a cue capable of capturing attention.

AB - In this study we investigated under what conditions motion direction changes pop out in continuously moving target/distractor environments. Participants were presented with vertically oriented Gabor patches whose carrier components drifted at a constant speed from left to right and then reversed direction. On any given trial, one of these elements was nominated as the target and the remaining elements were distractors. Distractor elements all changed direction simultaneously. The distractors either moved in a homogeneous manner (i.e. all moved in the same direction), or in a heterogeneous manner (i.e. direction was randomized). The target moved with a similar spatio-temporal trajectory as the distractors from left to right (or vice versa), but changed direction asynchronously with respect to the distracting elements. The participants’ task was to locate this deviant (target) Gabor patch. We show that a motion direction change pops out (as indicated by the absence of a set size effect) when the surrounding distractors move in a homogeneous direction. When the distractors moved in heterogenous directions, a similar pop out effect was observed when the set size was small (≤5 elements), but not when it was large. This suggests that motion direction changes capture attention only when the change results in a unique direction of motion. Consistent with this finding we also show that a moving target (without direction change) captures attention in cases in which all distractors recently changed direction. This corroborates the idea that, in addition to direction cues, the temporal uniqueness of a change in an object's direction (or absence, thereof) relative to surrounding objects is a cue capable of capturing attention.

KW - Attention

KW - Attentional capture

KW - Motion

KW - Vision

KW - Visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073678963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073678963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.008

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.008

M3 - Article

VL - 165

SP - 54

EP - 63

JO - Vision research

JF - Vision research

SN - 0042-6989

ER -