Abstract
Research with cows, white lions, and other forms of interspecies fieldwork presents deep methodological challenges. Traditional, human-centered ethnography falls short in capturing how non-human interlocutors shape the conditions, possibilities, and dynamics of research. Drawing on two contrasting case studies – a dairy calf in the Netherlands and white lions in South Africa – we show that interspecies ethnography requires unlearning human-centered bodily habits, developing species-specific sensitivity, and recognizing the active role of animals in shaping the temporalities, spatialities, and sensory registers of research encounters. We argue that emotions, tactile engagement, and multimodal communication are not supplementary, but fundamental elements of knowledge-making in communities that involve both humans and animals. Our comparative analysis of prey and predator contexts highlights how species, power relations, and material infrastructures shape what counts as participation and understanding. We conclude that preparing students for multispecies research demands a rethinking of ethnographic training, placing slow, embodied, and affectively engaged learning with other-than-human beings at the center.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 14661381251383291 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Ethnography |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 4 Nov 2025 |
Funding
The first author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported by NWO-M, award number is 406.22.CTW.007.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| NWO-M | 406.22 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Changing bodily practices in interspecies communities with dairy cows and white lions: Methodological challenges in co-constructing meaning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver