Changing collaborative practices through cultural interventions

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

After a parliamentary enquiry into construction industry malpractice, changes occurred in collaborative practices between clients and contractors in megaprojects within the Dutch construction sector. The enquiry meant that both clients and contractors were forced to acknowledge illegal practices of collusion and fraud. For those engaged in public-private relationships, a process followed of attempting to change collaborative practices. Three interventions in collaborative practices are recounted: (1) organizing personal networks between clients and contractors; (2) a competitive dialogue procedure; and (3) the right of withdrawal. These three interventions helped to change first order practice, such as increasing mutual trust between client and contractor, supporting a mutual understanding of role positioning and dilemmas, and creating an understanding of the nature of the conflict but failed to change second order practices. Two contributions to the understanding of project management are provided. New empirical data are presented on the challenges that public and private partners face in their attempt to implement new collaborative practices. It is shown how power is entangled in the emerging of new collaborative practices. The findings are based on a longitudinal ethnographic study of public-private collaboration in the Dutch construction industry in the period 2006-11. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)330-342
JournalBuilding Research and Information
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Contractors
Construction industry
Project management

Cite this

@article{eaf6e7f85b9c4768b6d65965b010bc0d,
title = "Changing collaborative practices through cultural interventions",
abstract = "After a parliamentary enquiry into construction industry malpractice, changes occurred in collaborative practices between clients and contractors in megaprojects within the Dutch construction sector. The enquiry meant that both clients and contractors were forced to acknowledge illegal practices of collusion and fraud. For those engaged in public-private relationships, a process followed of attempting to change collaborative practices. Three interventions in collaborative practices are recounted: (1) organizing personal networks between clients and contractors; (2) a competitive dialogue procedure; and (3) the right of withdrawal. These three interventions helped to change first order practice, such as increasing mutual trust between client and contractor, supporting a mutual understanding of role positioning and dilemmas, and creating an understanding of the nature of the conflict but failed to change second order practices. Two contributions to the understanding of project management are provided. New empirical data are presented on the challenges that public and private partners face in their attempt to implement new collaborative practices. It is shown how power is entangled in the emerging of new collaborative practices. The findings are based on a longitudinal ethnographic study of public-private collaboration in the Dutch construction industry in the period 2006-11. {\circledC} 2014 {\circledC} 2014 Taylor & Francis.",
author = "{van Marrewijk}, A.H. and M.B. Veenswijk and S.R. Clegg",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/09613218.2014.867619",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "330--342",
journal = "Building Research and Information",
issn = "0961-3218",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Changing collaborative practices through cultural interventions. / van Marrewijk, A.H.; Veenswijk, M.B.; Clegg, S.R.

In: Building Research and Information, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2014, p. 330-342.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing collaborative practices through cultural interventions

AU - van Marrewijk, A.H.

AU - Veenswijk, M.B.

AU - Clegg, S.R.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - After a parliamentary enquiry into construction industry malpractice, changes occurred in collaborative practices between clients and contractors in megaprojects within the Dutch construction sector. The enquiry meant that both clients and contractors were forced to acknowledge illegal practices of collusion and fraud. For those engaged in public-private relationships, a process followed of attempting to change collaborative practices. Three interventions in collaborative practices are recounted: (1) organizing personal networks between clients and contractors; (2) a competitive dialogue procedure; and (3) the right of withdrawal. These three interventions helped to change first order practice, such as increasing mutual trust between client and contractor, supporting a mutual understanding of role positioning and dilemmas, and creating an understanding of the nature of the conflict but failed to change second order practices. Two contributions to the understanding of project management are provided. New empirical data are presented on the challenges that public and private partners face in their attempt to implement new collaborative practices. It is shown how power is entangled in the emerging of new collaborative practices. The findings are based on a longitudinal ethnographic study of public-private collaboration in the Dutch construction industry in the period 2006-11. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.

AB - After a parliamentary enquiry into construction industry malpractice, changes occurred in collaborative practices between clients and contractors in megaprojects within the Dutch construction sector. The enquiry meant that both clients and contractors were forced to acknowledge illegal practices of collusion and fraud. For those engaged in public-private relationships, a process followed of attempting to change collaborative practices. Three interventions in collaborative practices are recounted: (1) organizing personal networks between clients and contractors; (2) a competitive dialogue procedure; and (3) the right of withdrawal. These three interventions helped to change first order practice, such as increasing mutual trust between client and contractor, supporting a mutual understanding of role positioning and dilemmas, and creating an understanding of the nature of the conflict but failed to change second order practices. Two contributions to the understanding of project management are provided. New empirical data are presented on the challenges that public and private partners face in their attempt to implement new collaborative practices. It is shown how power is entangled in the emerging of new collaborative practices. The findings are based on a longitudinal ethnographic study of public-private collaboration in the Dutch construction industry in the period 2006-11. © 2014 © 2014 Taylor & Francis.

U2 - 10.1080/09613218.2014.867619

DO - 10.1080/09613218.2014.867619

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 330

EP - 342

JO - Building Research and Information

JF - Building Research and Information

SN - 0961-3218

IS - 3

ER -