TY - JOUR
T1 - Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side.
AU - van Ulzen, N.R.
AU - Lamoth, C.J.C.
AU - Daffertshofer, A.
AU - Semin, G.R.
AU - Beek, P.J.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - We examined how people synchronize their leg movements while walking side-by-side on a treadmill. Walker pairs were either instructed to synchronize their steps in in-phase or in antiphase or received no coordination instructions. Frequency and phase analysis revealed that instructed in-phase and antiphase coordination were equally stable and independent of walking speed and the difference in individually preferred stride frequencies. Without instruction we found episodes of frequency locking in three pairs and episodes of phase locking in four pairs, albeit not always at (or near) 0° or 180°. Again, we found no difference in the stability of in-phase and antiphase coordination and no systematic effects of walking speed and the difference in individually preferred stride frequencies. These results suggest that the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model for rhythmic interlimb coordination does not apply to interpersonal coordination during gait in a straightforward manner. When the typically involved parameter constraints are relaxed, however, this model may largely account for the observed dynamical characteristics. © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - We examined how people synchronize their leg movements while walking side-by-side on a treadmill. Walker pairs were either instructed to synchronize their steps in in-phase or in antiphase or received no coordination instructions. Frequency and phase analysis revealed that instructed in-phase and antiphase coordination were equally stable and independent of walking speed and the difference in individually preferred stride frequencies. Without instruction we found episodes of frequency locking in three pairs and episodes of phase locking in four pairs, albeit not always at (or near) 0° or 180°. Again, we found no difference in the stability of in-phase and antiphase coordination and no systematic effects of walking speed and the difference in individually preferred stride frequencies. These results suggest that the Haken-Kelso-Bunz model for rhythmic interlimb coordination does not apply to interpersonal coordination during gait in a straightforward manner. When the typically involved parameter constraints are relaxed, however, this model may largely account for the observed dynamical characteristics. © 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/39149137808
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149137808&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.070
DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.070
M3 - Article
SN - 0304-3940
VL - 432
SP - 88
EP - 93
JO - Neuroscience Letters
JF - Neuroscience Letters
IS - 2
ER -