CHARMed PyMca, Part II: An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys

A. Heginbotham, D. Bourgarit, J. Day, J. Dorscheid, J. Godla, L. Lee, A. Pappot, D. Robcis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

CHARMed PyMca is a protocol for researchers using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (ED-XRF) who wish to maximize interlaboratory reproducibility of quantitative results from copper alloys found in heritage materials. This paper reports the results of a study evaluating the interlaboratory reproducibility expected when following this protocol. Five institutions participated in this study, using nine tube-based instruments of seven types. A set of 12 reference materials not used for calibration was analysed according to the protocol. The results show an improvement in reproducibility of between 65% and 83%, depending on the element, in comparison with a similar study carried out in 2010. The protocol allowed the consistent reporting of concentrations for 15 elements, in contrast to only eight elements that were reported in the 2010 study. Finally, the protocol was shown to generate accurate quantitative results with a well-characterized precision. It is hoped the information presented here can help researchers studying heritage copper alloys to collaborate more effectively and with greater confidence in the reproducibility of their results. It should also aid researchers to make realistic and informed decisions about whether or not the degree of reproducibility that they may expect from ED-XRF makes the protocol suitable for their specific purposes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1333-1352
Number of pages20
JournalArchaeometry
Volume61
Issue number6
Early online date18 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

energy
evaluation
confidence
Evaluation
Copper Alloys
Spectroscopy
Reproducibility
Heritage

Keywords

  • calibration
  • copper
  • fundamental parameters
  • reproducibility
  • XRF

Cite this

Heginbotham, A., Bourgarit, D., Day, J., Dorscheid, J., Godla, J., Lee, L., ... Robcis, D. (2019). CHARMed PyMca, Part II: An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys. Archaeometry, 61(6), 1333-1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12488
Heginbotham, A. ; Bourgarit, D. ; Day, J. ; Dorscheid, J. ; Godla, J. ; Lee, L. ; Pappot, A. ; Robcis, D. / CHARMed PyMca, Part II : An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys. In: Archaeometry. 2019 ; Vol. 61, No. 6. pp. 1333-1352.
@article{2115055197e244ab85eff325ebcb937b,
title = "CHARMed PyMca, Part II: An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys",
abstract = "CHARMed PyMca is a protocol for researchers using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (ED-XRF) who wish to maximize interlaboratory reproducibility of quantitative results from copper alloys found in heritage materials. This paper reports the results of a study evaluating the interlaboratory reproducibility expected when following this protocol. Five institutions participated in this study, using nine tube-based instruments of seven types. A set of 12 reference materials not used for calibration was analysed according to the protocol. The results show an improvement in reproducibility of between 65{\%} and 83{\%}, depending on the element, in comparison with a similar study carried out in 2010. The protocol allowed the consistent reporting of concentrations for 15 elements, in contrast to only eight elements that were reported in the 2010 study. Finally, the protocol was shown to generate accurate quantitative results with a well-characterized precision. It is hoped the information presented here can help researchers studying heritage copper alloys to collaborate more effectively and with greater confidence in the reproducibility of their results. It should also aid researchers to make realistic and informed decisions about whether or not the degree of reproducibility that they may expect from ED-XRF makes the protocol suitable for their specific purposes.",
keywords = "calibration, copper, fundamental parameters, reproducibility, XRF",
author = "A. Heginbotham and D. Bourgarit and J. Day and J. Dorscheid and J. Godla and L. Lee and A. Pappot and D. Robcis",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/arcm.12488",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "1333--1352",
journal = "Archaeometry",
issn = "0003-813X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Heginbotham, A, Bourgarit, D, Day, J, Dorscheid, J, Godla, J, Lee, L, Pappot, A & Robcis, D 2019, 'CHARMed PyMca, Part II: An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys' Archaeometry, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1333-1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/arcm.12488

CHARMed PyMca, Part II : An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys. / Heginbotham, A.; Bourgarit, D.; Day, J.; Dorscheid, J.; Godla, J.; Lee, L.; Pappot, A.; Robcis, D.

In: Archaeometry, Vol. 61, No. 6, 01.12.2019, p. 1333-1352.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - CHARMed PyMca, Part II

T2 - An evaluation of interlaboratory reproducibility for ED-XRF analysis of copper alloys

AU - Heginbotham, A.

AU - Bourgarit, D.

AU - Day, J.

AU - Dorscheid, J.

AU - Godla, J.

AU - Lee, L.

AU - Pappot, A.

AU - Robcis, D.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - CHARMed PyMca is a protocol for researchers using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (ED-XRF) who wish to maximize interlaboratory reproducibility of quantitative results from copper alloys found in heritage materials. This paper reports the results of a study evaluating the interlaboratory reproducibility expected when following this protocol. Five institutions participated in this study, using nine tube-based instruments of seven types. A set of 12 reference materials not used for calibration was analysed according to the protocol. The results show an improvement in reproducibility of between 65% and 83%, depending on the element, in comparison with a similar study carried out in 2010. The protocol allowed the consistent reporting of concentrations for 15 elements, in contrast to only eight elements that were reported in the 2010 study. Finally, the protocol was shown to generate accurate quantitative results with a well-characterized precision. It is hoped the information presented here can help researchers studying heritage copper alloys to collaborate more effectively and with greater confidence in the reproducibility of their results. It should also aid researchers to make realistic and informed decisions about whether or not the degree of reproducibility that they may expect from ED-XRF makes the protocol suitable for their specific purposes.

AB - CHARMed PyMca is a protocol for researchers using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (ED-XRF) who wish to maximize interlaboratory reproducibility of quantitative results from copper alloys found in heritage materials. This paper reports the results of a study evaluating the interlaboratory reproducibility expected when following this protocol. Five institutions participated in this study, using nine tube-based instruments of seven types. A set of 12 reference materials not used for calibration was analysed according to the protocol. The results show an improvement in reproducibility of between 65% and 83%, depending on the element, in comparison with a similar study carried out in 2010. The protocol allowed the consistent reporting of concentrations for 15 elements, in contrast to only eight elements that were reported in the 2010 study. Finally, the protocol was shown to generate accurate quantitative results with a well-characterized precision. It is hoped the information presented here can help researchers studying heritage copper alloys to collaborate more effectively and with greater confidence in the reproducibility of their results. It should also aid researchers to make realistic and informed decisions about whether or not the degree of reproducibility that they may expect from ED-XRF makes the protocol suitable for their specific purposes.

KW - calibration

KW - copper

KW - fundamental parameters

KW - reproducibility

KW - XRF

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074305758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074305758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/arcm.12488

DO - 10.1111/arcm.12488

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1333

EP - 1352

JO - Archaeometry

JF - Archaeometry

SN - 0003-813X

IS - 6

ER -