Children's mental models of prenatal development

Tessa J.P. van Schijndel, Sara E. van Es, Rooske K. Franse, Bianca M.C.W. van Bers, Maartje E.J. Raijmakers*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Children's thinking about prenatal development requires reasoning about change that cannot be observed directly. How do children gain knowledge about this topic? Do children have mental models or is their knowledge fragmented? In Experiment 1, results of a forced-choice questionnaire about prenatal development (6- to 13-year-olds; N = 317) indicated that children do have a variety of coherent, grade-related, theories about early shape of the fetus, but not about bodily functions. Coherence of the mental models was enhanced by a preceding generative task. Children's mental models were in agreement with reasoning about natural transformations (Rosengren et al., 1991) and constraints in representational flexibility (Karmiloff-Smith, 1992). In Experiment 2, an open-question interview was administered (6- to 12-year-old children; N = 38). The interview resulted in grade-unrelated, incoherent responses. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of naïve biology and to the effects of different methodologies being used in the area of mental models.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1835
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume9
Issue numberOctober
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • Fragmented knowledge
  • Latent variable models
  • Mental models
  • Naïve biology
  • Prenatal development
  • Representational-redescription

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Children's mental models of prenatal development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this