TY - JOUR
T1 - Circulating T cell status and molecular imaging may predict clinical benefit of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in oral cancer
AU - Wondergem, Niels E.
AU - Miedema, Iris H.C.
AU - Van De Ven, Rieneke
AU - Zwezerijnen, Gerben J.C.
AU - De Graaf, Pim
AU - Karagozoglu, K. Hakki
AU - Hendrickx, Jan Jaap
AU - Eerenstein, Simone E.J.
AU - Bun, Rolf J.
AU - Mulder, Dorien C.
AU - Voortman, Jens
AU - Boellaard, Ronald
AU - Windhorst, Albert D.
AU - Hagers, J. Pascal
AU - Peferoen, Laura A.N.
AU - De Gruijl, Tanja D.
AU - Bloemena, Elisabeth
AU - Brakenhoff, Ruud H.
AU - Leemans, C. René
AU - Menke-Van Der Houven Van Oordt, C. Willemien
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background Addition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome. Methods In this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated with one dose of 480 mg nivolumab 3 weeks prior to surgery. Primary objectives were safety, feasibility, and suitability of programmed death receptor ligand-1 positron emission tomography (PD-L1 PET) as a biomarker for response. Imaging included 18 F-BMS-986192 (PD-L1) PET and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET before and after nivolumab treatment. Secondary objectives included clinical and pathological response, and immune profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for response prediction. Baseline tumor biopsies and postnivolumab resection specimens were evaluated by histopathology. Results Grade III or higher adverse events were not observed and treatment was not delayed in relation to nivolumab administration and other study procedures. Six patients (38%) had a pathological response, of whom three (19%) had a major (≥90%) pathological response (MPR). Tumor PD-L1 PET uptake (quantified using standard uptake value) was not statistically different in patients with or without MPR (median 5.3 vs 3.4). All major responders showed a significantly postnivolumab decreased signal on FDG PET. PBMC immune phenotyping showed higher levels of CD8 + T cell activation in MPR patients, evidenced by higher baseline expression levels of PD-1, TIGIT, IFNγand lower levels of PD-L1. Conclusion Together these data support that neoadjuvant treatment of advanced-stage oral cancers with nivolumab was safe and induced an MPR in a promising 19% of patients. Response was associated with decreased FDG PET uptake as well as activation status of peripheral T cell populations.
AB - Background Addition of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition to standard-of-care interventions for locally advanced oral cancer could improve clinical outcome. Methods In this study, 16 evaluable patients with stage III/IV oral cancer were treated with one dose of 480 mg nivolumab 3 weeks prior to surgery. Primary objectives were safety, feasibility, and suitability of programmed death receptor ligand-1 positron emission tomography (PD-L1 PET) as a biomarker for response. Imaging included 18 F-BMS-986192 (PD-L1) PET and 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET before and after nivolumab treatment. Secondary objectives included clinical and pathological response, and immune profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) for response prediction. Baseline tumor biopsies and postnivolumab resection specimens were evaluated by histopathology. Results Grade III or higher adverse events were not observed and treatment was not delayed in relation to nivolumab administration and other study procedures. Six patients (38%) had a pathological response, of whom three (19%) had a major (≥90%) pathological response (MPR). Tumor PD-L1 PET uptake (quantified using standard uptake value) was not statistically different in patients with or without MPR (median 5.3 vs 3.4). All major responders showed a significantly postnivolumab decreased signal on FDG PET. PBMC immune phenotyping showed higher levels of CD8 + T cell activation in MPR patients, evidenced by higher baseline expression levels of PD-1, TIGIT, IFNγand lower levels of PD-L1. Conclusion Together these data support that neoadjuvant treatment of advanced-stage oral cancers with nivolumab was safe and induced an MPR in a promising 19% of patients. Response was associated with decreased FDG PET uptake as well as activation status of peripheral T cell populations.
KW - Head and Neck Cancer
KW - Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
KW - Neoadjuvant
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199495523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199495523&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jitc-2024-009278
DO - 10.1136/jitc-2024-009278
M3 - Article
C2 - 39038919
AN - SCOPUS:85199495523
SN - 2051-1426
VL - 12
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
JF - Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
IS - 7
M1 - e009278
ER -