Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the proliferation and promise of subnational climate initiatives, the institutional architecture of transnational municipal networks (TMNs) is not well understood. With a view to close this research gap, the article empirically assesses the assumption that TMNs are a viable substitute for ambitious international action under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). It addresses the aggregate phenomenon in terms of geographical distribution, central players, mitigation ambition and monitoring provisions. Examining thirteen networks, it finds that membership in TMNs is skewed toward Europe and North America while countries from the Global South are underrepresented; that only a minority of networks commit to quantified emission reductions and that these are not more ambitious than Parties to the UNFCCC; and finally that the monitoring provisions are fairly limited. In sum, the article shows that transnational municipal networks are not (yet) the representative, ambitious and transparent player they are thought to be.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-246
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date5 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this