Abstract
In this chapter we problematize the general assumption that appeals against polarization, which aim to return society to a state of balance and stability, are unquestionably good. We posit that, at closer inspection, such appeals help normalize racial violence through a politics of constraint and a post-political understanding of polarization. Through an analysis of the campaign "Dare to be Grey"'s rhetorical positioning, we demonstrate that rather than serving as a “neutral” alternative to “black/white thinking,” “greyness” actually reinforces the colonial logics of whiteness and anti-blackness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Postcolonial Europe |
| Subtitle of host publication | Comparative Reflections after the Empires |
| Editors | Lars Jensen, Julia Suárez-Krabbe, Christian Groes, Zoran Lee Pecic |
| Place of Publication | London, New York |
| Publisher | Rowman & Littlefield |
| Pages | 75-90 |
| ISBN (Print) | HB 978-1-7866-0304-3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- anti-blackness
- polarization
- whiteness
- racism
VU Research Profile
- Connected World
- Governance for Society
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Claiming Greyness: Dutch Coloniality Against Polarisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver