TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate adaptation in fragmented governance settings: the consequences of reform in public administration
AU - den Uijl, R.M.
AU - Russel, Duncan J.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - The impact of dominant trends in public administration, such as decentralisation and privatisation on complex collective challenges is insufficiently understood. This is relevant in settings where climate change impacts become manifest at local level, and where financing power resides at national level but decisions are made more locally in a fragmented institutional setting. This study assists in overcoming this gap by analysing how the institutional context (i.e. a decentralised, privatised, fragmented setting) influences the capacity to address climate change challenges in a vulnerable area (the South Devon coast in the UK). There has been little action to address expected climate change impacts in this vulnerable stretch of coast. A lack of clarity around responsibility for addressing climate impacts and a lack of a deliberative structure between various actors involved, within a context of austerity, hamper climate change adaptation. The findings question whether decentralised decision making is sufficient for addressing climate adaptation challenges.
AB - The impact of dominant trends in public administration, such as decentralisation and privatisation on complex collective challenges is insufficiently understood. This is relevant in settings where climate change impacts become manifest at local level, and where financing power resides at national level but decisions are made more locally in a fragmented institutional setting. This study assists in overcoming this gap by analysing how the institutional context (i.e. a decentralised, privatised, fragmented setting) influences the capacity to address climate change challenges in a vulnerable area (the South Devon coast in the UK). There has been little action to address expected climate change impacts in this vulnerable stretch of coast. A lack of clarity around responsibility for addressing climate impacts and a lack of a deliberative structure between various actors involved, within a context of austerity, hamper climate change adaptation. The findings question whether decentralised decision making is sufficient for addressing climate adaptation challenges.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031128398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031128398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2017.1386341
DO - 10.1080/09644016.2017.1386341
M3 - Article
SN - 0964-4016
VL - 27
SP - 341
EP - 361
JO - Environmental Politics
JF - Environmental Politics
IS - 2
ER -