Climate change and reversed intergenerational equity: The problem of costs now, for benefits later

Gareth Davies*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Climate change is often seen as an issue of intergenerational equity - consumption now creates costs for future generations. However, radical mitigation now would reverse the problem, creating immediate costs for current generations, while the benefits would be primarily for future ones. This is a policy problem, as persuading those living now to bear the cost of changes whose benefits will mostly accrue after their deaths is politically difficult. The policy challenge is then how to temporally match costs to benefits, either by deferring mitigation costs, or by speeding up climatic benefits. Geoengineering may provide some help here, as it might enable climate change to be slowed more immediately, at a lower upfront cost, and allow a greater share of the mitigation and adaptation burden to be passed on to those in the future who will benefit most.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)266-281
Number of pages16
JournalClimate Law
Volume10
Issue number3-4
Early online date18 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit analysis
  • Geoengineering
  • Intergenerational equity
  • Intergenerational justice
  • Mitigation costs
  • Negative-emission technologies (NETs)
  • Solar radiation management (SRM)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Climate change and reversed intergenerational equity: The problem of costs now, for benefits later'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this