Climate policies under climate model uncertainty: Max-min and min-max regret

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Temperature responses and optimal climate policies depend crucially on the choice of a particular climate model. To illustrate, the temperature responses to given emission reduction paths implied by the climate modules of the well-known integrated assessments models DICE, FUND and PAGE are described and compared. A dummy temperature module based on the climate denialists' view is added. Using a simple welfare-maximising growth model of the global economy, the sensitivity of the optimal carbon price, renewable energy subsidy and energy transition to each of these climate models is discussed. The paper then derives max-min, max-max and min-max regret policies to deal with this particular form of climate (model) uncertainty and with climate scepticism. The max-min or min-max regret climate policies rely on a non-sceptic view of global warming and lead to a substantial and moderate amount of caution, respectively. The max-max leads to no climate policies in line with the view of climate sceptics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-16
JournalEnergy Economics
Volume68
Issue numberOctober
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Climate models
Global warming
Temperature
Carbon
Uncertainty
Climate policy
Climate
Model uncertainty

Keywords

  • Carbon price
  • Climate model uncertainty
  • Climate sceptics
  • Max-max
  • Max-min
  • Min-max regret
  • Renewable energy subsidy
  • Temperature modules

Cite this

@article{9f195a0c4ce14b66bb2fb12e3f5a5876,
title = "Climate policies under climate model uncertainty: Max-min and min-max regret",
abstract = "Temperature responses and optimal climate policies depend crucially on the choice of a particular climate model. To illustrate, the temperature responses to given emission reduction paths implied by the climate modules of the well-known integrated assessments models DICE, FUND and PAGE are described and compared. A dummy temperature module based on the climate denialists' view is added. Using a simple welfare-maximising growth model of the global economy, the sensitivity of the optimal carbon price, renewable energy subsidy and energy transition to each of these climate models is discussed. The paper then derives max-min, max-max and min-max regret policies to deal with this particular form of climate (model) uncertainty and with climate scepticism. The max-min or min-max regret climate policies rely on a non-sceptic view of global warming and lead to a substantial and moderate amount of caution, respectively. The max-max leads to no climate policies in line with the view of climate sceptics.",
keywords = "Carbon price, Climate model uncertainty, Climate sceptics, Max-max, Max-min, Min-max regret, Renewable energy subsidy, Temperature modules",
author = "Armon Rezai and {van der Ploeg}, Frederick",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.018",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "4--16",
journal = "Energy Economics",
issn = "0140-9883",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "October",

}

Climate policies under climate model uncertainty : Max-min and min-max regret. / Rezai, Armon; van der Ploeg, Frederick.

In: Energy Economics, Vol. 68, No. October, 2018, p. 4-16.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Climate policies under climate model uncertainty

T2 - Max-min and min-max regret

AU - Rezai, Armon

AU - van der Ploeg, Frederick

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Temperature responses and optimal climate policies depend crucially on the choice of a particular climate model. To illustrate, the temperature responses to given emission reduction paths implied by the climate modules of the well-known integrated assessments models DICE, FUND and PAGE are described and compared. A dummy temperature module based on the climate denialists' view is added. Using a simple welfare-maximising growth model of the global economy, the sensitivity of the optimal carbon price, renewable energy subsidy and energy transition to each of these climate models is discussed. The paper then derives max-min, max-max and min-max regret policies to deal with this particular form of climate (model) uncertainty and with climate scepticism. The max-min or min-max regret climate policies rely on a non-sceptic view of global warming and lead to a substantial and moderate amount of caution, respectively. The max-max leads to no climate policies in line with the view of climate sceptics.

AB - Temperature responses and optimal climate policies depend crucially on the choice of a particular climate model. To illustrate, the temperature responses to given emission reduction paths implied by the climate modules of the well-known integrated assessments models DICE, FUND and PAGE are described and compared. A dummy temperature module based on the climate denialists' view is added. Using a simple welfare-maximising growth model of the global economy, the sensitivity of the optimal carbon price, renewable energy subsidy and energy transition to each of these climate models is discussed. The paper then derives max-min, max-max and min-max regret policies to deal with this particular form of climate (model) uncertainty and with climate scepticism. The max-min or min-max regret climate policies rely on a non-sceptic view of global warming and lead to a substantial and moderate amount of caution, respectively. The max-max leads to no climate policies in line with the view of climate sceptics.

KW - Carbon price

KW - Climate model uncertainty

KW - Climate sceptics

KW - Max-max

KW - Max-min

KW - Min-max regret

KW - Renewable energy subsidy

KW - Temperature modules

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033566417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033566417&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.10.018

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 4

EP - 16

JO - Energy Economics

JF - Energy Economics

SN - 0140-9883

IS - October

ER -