CO2 emissions of drained coastal peatlands in the Netherlands and potential emission reduction by water infiltration systems

Ralf C.H. Aben*, Daniël Van De Craats, Jim Boonman, Stijn H. Peeters, Bart Vriend, Coline C.F. Boonman, Ype Van Der Velde, Gilles Erkens, Merit Van Den Berg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Worldwide, the drainage of peatlands has turned these systems from CO2 sinks into sources. In the Netherlands, where ĝ1/47 % of the land surface consists of peatlands, drained peat soils contribute >90 % and ĝ1/43 % to the country's soil-derived and total CO2 emissions, respectively. Hence, the Dutch National Climate Agreement has set targets to cut these emissions. One potential mitigation measure is the application of subsurface water infiltration systems (WISs) consisting of subsurface pipes connected to ditchwater. WISs aim to raise the water table depth (WTD) in dry periods to limit peat oxidation while maintaining current land-use practices. Here, we used automated transparent chambers in 12 peat pasture plots across the Netherlands to measure CO2 fluxes at high frequency and assess (1) the relationship between WTD and CO2 emissions for Dutch peatlands and (2) the effectiveness of WISs in mitigating emissions. Net ecosystem carbon balances (NECBs) (up to 4 years per site, 2020-2023) averaged 3.77 and 2.66 tCO2-Cha-1yr-1 for control and WIS sites, respectively. The magnitude of NECBs and the slope of the WTD-NECB relationship fall within the range of observations of earlier studies in Europe, though they were notably lower than those based on campaign-wise, closed-chamber measurements. The relationship between annual exposed carbon (C; defined as the total amount of carbon within the soil above the average annual WTD) and NECB explained more variance than the WTD-NECB relationship. The magnitude of the NECB represented 1.0 % of the annual exposed C on average, with a maximum of 2.4 %. We found strong evidence for a reducing effect of WISs on CO2 emissions, reducing emissions by 2.1 (95 % confidence interval 1.2-3.0) tCO2-Cha-1yr-1, and no evidence for an effect of WISs on the WTD-NECB and annual exposed carbon-NECB relationships. This means that relationships between either WTD or exposed carbon and NECB can be used to estimate the emission reduction for a given WIS-induced increase in WTD or exposed carbon. High year-to-year variation in NECBs calls for multi-year measurements and sufficient representative measurement years per site as demonstrated in this study with 35 site-year observations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4099-4118
Number of pages20
JournalBiogeosciences
Volume21
Issue number18
Early online date20 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Ralf C. H. Aben et al.

Funding

This research was funded by the Netherlands Research Programme on Greenhouse gas Dynamics in Peatlands and organic Soils (NOBV) and (co-)funded by the WUR internal programme KB-34 Towards a Circular and Climate-Neutral Society (2019-2024), project KB-34-002-005 (Reversing declining soils mitigating climate innovation in peatland management). We thank our (former) colleagues within the NOBV for maintaining the field sites, providing technical support, and managing remote data accessibility. We also thank the landowners for allowing us to conduct this research on their fields. Financial support. This research has been supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (Netherlands Research Programme on Greenhouse gas dynamics in Peatlands and organic soils - NOBV) and by the WUR internal programme KB34 Towards a Circular and Climate Neutral Society (2019- 2024), project KB-34-002-005 (Reversing declining soils mitigating climate innovation in peatland management).We thank our (former) colleagues within the NOBV project for maintaining the field sites, providing technical support, and managing remote data accessibility. We also thank the landowners for allowing us to conduct this research on their fields. This research was funded by the Netherlands Research Programme on Greenhouse gas Dynamics in Peatlands and organic Soils (NOBV) and (co-)funded by the WUR internal programme KB-34 Towards a Circular and Climate-Neutral Society (2019\u20132024), project KB-34-002-005 (Reversing declining soils mitigating climate innovation in peatland management). We thank our (former) colleagues within the NOBV for maintaining the field sites, providing technical support, and managing remote data accessibility. We also thank the landowners for allowing us to conduct this research on their fields. This research has been supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (Netherlands Research Programme on Greenhouse gas dynamics in Peatlands and organic soils \u2013 NOBV) and by the WUR internal programme KB34 Towards a Circular and Climate Neutral Society (2019-2024), project KB-34-002-005 (Reversing declining soils mitigating climate innovation in peatland management). We thank our (former) colleagues within the NOBV project for maintaining the field sites, providing technical support, and managing remote data accessibility. We also thank the landowners for allowing us to conduct this research on their fields.

FundersFunder number
Circular and Climate Neutral Society
Netherlands Research Programme on Greenhouse gas Dynamics
Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Climate-Neutral Society2019-2024, KB-34-002-005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'CO2 emissions of drained coastal peatlands in the Netherlands and potential emission reduction by water infiltration systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this