Coarse tolling under heterogeneous preference

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyses optimal coarse tolling of congestion under heterogeneous preferences, and in particular its welfare and distributional effects. With coarse tolling, the toll equals a fixed value during the centre of the peak, whereas outside this period it is zero. This paper separately investigates three dimensions of heterogeneity. With the first, all values of time and schedule delay vary in fixed proportions, and this heterogeneity may stem from income differences. The second has differences in the flexibility of users in when to arrive. The third captures differences in willingness to arrive before or after the preferred arrival time. The paper uses three models of coarse tolling: the 'Laih', 'ADL' and 'Braking' model.All three dimensions affect the welfare gain of coarse tolling. In the Laih model, the generalised price with coarse tolling is always in between the no-toll and first-best prices. In the other models, this is not the case, and the distributional effects of coarse tolling may be non-monotonic and very different from the distributional effects with first-best tolling. In the Braking model, the bottleneck capacity goes unused for some time during the tolled period. Compared to in the Laih model, this raises the total cost, and it is most harmful for users with low values of time and schedule delay and for users with a relatively high value of schedule delay late: these users could, for instance, be low-income users with a strict work start time or travelling to a doctor's appointment. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-23
JournalTransportation Research. Part B: Methodological
Volume64
Issue numberJune
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Braking
welfare
low income
flexibility
time
income
costs
Costs
Values

Cite this

@article{5057dd33d389475ba773e2be844f3047,
title = "Coarse tolling under heterogeneous preference",
abstract = "This paper analyses optimal coarse tolling of congestion under heterogeneous preferences, and in particular its welfare and distributional effects. With coarse tolling, the toll equals a fixed value during the centre of the peak, whereas outside this period it is zero. This paper separately investigates three dimensions of heterogeneity. With the first, all values of time and schedule delay vary in fixed proportions, and this heterogeneity may stem from income differences. The second has differences in the flexibility of users in when to arrive. The third captures differences in willingness to arrive before or after the preferred arrival time. The paper uses three models of coarse tolling: the 'Laih', 'ADL' and 'Braking' model.All three dimensions affect the welfare gain of coarse tolling. In the Laih model, the generalised price with coarse tolling is always in between the no-toll and first-best prices. In the other models, this is not the case, and the distributional effects of coarse tolling may be non-monotonic and very different from the distributional effects with first-best tolling. In the Braking model, the bottleneck capacity goes unused for some time during the tolled period. Compared to in the Laih model, this raises the total cost, and it is most harmful for users with low values of time and schedule delay and for users with a relatively high value of schedule delay late: these users could, for instance, be low-income users with a strict work start time or travelling to a doctor's appointment. {\circledC} 2014 Elsevier Ltd.",
author = "{van den Berg}, V.A.C.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological",
issn = "0191-2615",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "June",

}

Coarse tolling under heterogeneous preference. / van den Berg, V.A.C.

In: Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, Vol. 64, No. June, 2014, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coarse tolling under heterogeneous preference

AU - van den Berg, V.A.C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper analyses optimal coarse tolling of congestion under heterogeneous preferences, and in particular its welfare and distributional effects. With coarse tolling, the toll equals a fixed value during the centre of the peak, whereas outside this period it is zero. This paper separately investigates three dimensions of heterogeneity. With the first, all values of time and schedule delay vary in fixed proportions, and this heterogeneity may stem from income differences. The second has differences in the flexibility of users in when to arrive. The third captures differences in willingness to arrive before or after the preferred arrival time. The paper uses three models of coarse tolling: the 'Laih', 'ADL' and 'Braking' model.All three dimensions affect the welfare gain of coarse tolling. In the Laih model, the generalised price with coarse tolling is always in between the no-toll and first-best prices. In the other models, this is not the case, and the distributional effects of coarse tolling may be non-monotonic and very different from the distributional effects with first-best tolling. In the Braking model, the bottleneck capacity goes unused for some time during the tolled period. Compared to in the Laih model, this raises the total cost, and it is most harmful for users with low values of time and schedule delay and for users with a relatively high value of schedule delay late: these users could, for instance, be low-income users with a strict work start time or travelling to a doctor's appointment. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - This paper analyses optimal coarse tolling of congestion under heterogeneous preferences, and in particular its welfare and distributional effects. With coarse tolling, the toll equals a fixed value during the centre of the peak, whereas outside this period it is zero. This paper separately investigates three dimensions of heterogeneity. With the first, all values of time and schedule delay vary in fixed proportions, and this heterogeneity may stem from income differences. The second has differences in the flexibility of users in when to arrive. The third captures differences in willingness to arrive before or after the preferred arrival time. The paper uses three models of coarse tolling: the 'Laih', 'ADL' and 'Braking' model.All three dimensions affect the welfare gain of coarse tolling. In the Laih model, the generalised price with coarse tolling is always in between the no-toll and first-best prices. In the other models, this is not the case, and the distributional effects of coarse tolling may be non-monotonic and very different from the distributional effects with first-best tolling. In the Braking model, the bottleneck capacity goes unused for some time during the tolled period. Compared to in the Laih model, this raises the total cost, and it is most harmful for users with low values of time and schedule delay and for users with a relatively high value of schedule delay late: these users could, for instance, be low-income users with a strict work start time or travelling to a doctor's appointment. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

U2 - 10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological

JF - Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological

SN - 0191-2615

IS - June

ER -