Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this contribution we explore how CSR relates to a core idea, important in mainstream Christianity, namely that sin and evil have certain cognitive consequences. The idea is the notion that sin, in addition to affective and existential consequences, has certain consequences for our knowledge, insight, and understanding. In particular, sin is believed to have diminished and distorted human knowledge of God. This is important, for, recently, a few authors in CSR, in particular Helen de Cruz and Johan de Smedt, have suggested that some CSR theories are in tension with the notion that sin has somehow diminished and distorted our human knowledge of God. According to them, it is problematic to claim that certain evolutionary explanations are correct and that sin has such cognitive consequences. After some terminological clarifications with respect to notions like ‘sin’, ‘cognitive consequences of sin’, the ‘Fall’, and ‘evolutionary explanations of religious belief’, we spell out in detail the argument developed by De Smedt and De Cruz against a historic Fall. Next, we pause a moment in order to ponder exactly what is at stake here. Subsequently, we discuss three possible solutions of how evolutionary explanations of religious belief can be wedded to a historic account of the Fall. We conclude that there is no tension between CSR on the one hand, and the ideas that human beings have fallen into sin and that that has had devastating cognitive consequences on the other.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationNew Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion
Subtitle of host publicationThe Rationality of Religious Belief
EditorsHans van Eyghen, Rik Peels, Gijsbert van den Brink
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer International Publishing AG
Chapter11
Pages199-214
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9783319902395
ISBN (Print)9783319902388
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Cognitive Science of Religion
Corporate Social Responsibility
Evolutionary
Knowledge of God
Historic
Human Knowledge
Religious Beliefs
Christianity
Affective
Pause
Evil
Human Being

Cite this

van den Brink, G., van Eyghen, H. M. R. A., & Peels, R. (2018). Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin. In H. van Eyghen, R. Peels, & G. van den Brink (Eds.), New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief (pp. 199-214). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
van den Brink, G. ; van Eyghen, H.M.R.A. ; Peels, R. / Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin. New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. editor / Hans van Eyghen ; Rik Peels ; Gijsbert van den Brink. Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. pp. 199-214
@inbook{141e8665585f4d5f918f38427c7f67fe,
title = "Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin",
abstract = "In this contribution we explore how CSR relates to a core idea, important in mainstream Christianity, namely that sin and evil have certain cognitive consequences. The idea is the notion that sin, in addition to affective and existential consequences, has certain consequences for our knowledge, insight, and understanding. In particular, sin is believed to have diminished and distorted human knowledge of God. This is important, for, recently, a few authors in CSR, in particular Helen de Cruz and Johan de Smedt, have suggested that some CSR theories are in tension with the notion that sin has somehow diminished and distorted our human knowledge of God. According to them, it is problematic to claim that certain evolutionary explanations are correct and that sin has such cognitive consequences. After some terminological clarifications with respect to notions like ‘sin’, ‘cognitive consequences of sin’, the ‘Fall’, and ‘evolutionary explanations of religious belief’, we spell out in detail the argument developed by De Smedt and De Cruz against a historic Fall. Next, we pause a moment in order to ponder exactly what is at stake here. Subsequently, we discuss three possible solutions of how evolutionary explanations of religious belief can be wedded to a historic account of the Fall. We conclude that there is no tension between CSR on the one hand, and the ideas that human beings have fallen into sin and that that has had devastating cognitive consequences on the other.",
author = "{van den Brink}, G. and {van Eyghen}, H.M.R.A. and R. Peels",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319902388",
pages = "199--214",
editor = "{van Eyghen}, {Hans } and Rik Peels and {van den Brink}, Gijsbert",
booktitle = "New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing AG",
address = "Switzerland",

}

van den Brink, G, van Eyghen, HMRA & Peels, R 2018, Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin. in H van Eyghen, R Peels & G van den Brink (eds), New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp. 199-214.

Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin. / van den Brink, G.; van Eyghen, H.M.R.A.; Peels, R.

New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. ed. / Hans van Eyghen; Rik Peels; Gijsbert van den Brink. Cham : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. p. 199-214.

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin

AU - van den Brink, G.

AU - van Eyghen, H.M.R.A.

AU - Peels, R.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - In this contribution we explore how CSR relates to a core idea, important in mainstream Christianity, namely that sin and evil have certain cognitive consequences. The idea is the notion that sin, in addition to affective and existential consequences, has certain consequences for our knowledge, insight, and understanding. In particular, sin is believed to have diminished and distorted human knowledge of God. This is important, for, recently, a few authors in CSR, in particular Helen de Cruz and Johan de Smedt, have suggested that some CSR theories are in tension with the notion that sin has somehow diminished and distorted our human knowledge of God. According to them, it is problematic to claim that certain evolutionary explanations are correct and that sin has such cognitive consequences. After some terminological clarifications with respect to notions like ‘sin’, ‘cognitive consequences of sin’, the ‘Fall’, and ‘evolutionary explanations of religious belief’, we spell out in detail the argument developed by De Smedt and De Cruz against a historic Fall. Next, we pause a moment in order to ponder exactly what is at stake here. Subsequently, we discuss three possible solutions of how evolutionary explanations of religious belief can be wedded to a historic account of the Fall. We conclude that there is no tension between CSR on the one hand, and the ideas that human beings have fallen into sin and that that has had devastating cognitive consequences on the other.

AB - In this contribution we explore how CSR relates to a core idea, important in mainstream Christianity, namely that sin and evil have certain cognitive consequences. The idea is the notion that sin, in addition to affective and existential consequences, has certain consequences for our knowledge, insight, and understanding. In particular, sin is believed to have diminished and distorted human knowledge of God. This is important, for, recently, a few authors in CSR, in particular Helen de Cruz and Johan de Smedt, have suggested that some CSR theories are in tension with the notion that sin has somehow diminished and distorted our human knowledge of God. According to them, it is problematic to claim that certain evolutionary explanations are correct and that sin has such cognitive consequences. After some terminological clarifications with respect to notions like ‘sin’, ‘cognitive consequences of sin’, the ‘Fall’, and ‘evolutionary explanations of religious belief’, we spell out in detail the argument developed by De Smedt and De Cruz against a historic Fall. Next, we pause a moment in order to ponder exactly what is at stake here. Subsequently, we discuss three possible solutions of how evolutionary explanations of religious belief can be wedded to a historic account of the Fall. We conclude that there is no tension between CSR on the one hand, and the ideas that human beings have fallen into sin and that that has had devastating cognitive consequences on the other.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319902388

SP - 199

EP - 214

BT - New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion

A2 - van Eyghen, Hans

A2 - Peels, Rik

A2 - van den Brink, Gijsbert

PB - Springer International Publishing AG

CY - Cham

ER -

van den Brink G, van Eyghen HMRA, Peels R. Cognitive Science of Religion and the Cognitive Consequences of Sin. In van Eyghen H, Peels R, van den Brink G, editors, New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. 2018. p. 199-214