Collaborative interviewing of eyewitnesses: A field study

Eva Amber Jacobina van Rosmalen*, Annelies Vredeveldt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose – When eyewitnesses talk to each other after witnessing a crime, they can contaminate each other’s memory. However, laboratory research shows that collaborative interviewing can also result in correction of mistakes and retrieval of more new information. The aim of this study is to examine whether these laboratory findings would generalise to real police interviews in The Netherlands. Because little is known about which interviewing techniques Dutch police detectives use, the secondary aim was to examine how Dutch detectives approach individual and collaborative eyewitness interviews. Design/methodology/approach – In a field study, witnesses of serious incidents (e.g. police shooting) were interviewed individually and then collaboratively by real investigators, resulting in 15 interviews of 1–2 h each from five witness pairs (5,534 details in total). Transcripts were coded for detail type, forensic relevance, verifiability, retrieval strategies and interviewing techniques. Results were described using both quantitative descriptive data and a qualitative analysis of interview excerpts.
Findings – On average, collaborative interviews resulted in 131 new details, over half of which were considered highly relevant to the police investigation. Interview excerpts demonstrated how content- focused retrieval strategies (acknowledgements, repetitions, restatements, elaborations) can elicit new and highly relevant details. Interviewers mostly asked clarifying questions and equal numbers of open, closed and yes/no questions, but rarely allowed for uninterrupted free recall. Interviewers asked a higher proportion of open questions during collaborative interviews than during individual interviews.
Research limitations/implications – Limitations included the small sample size and lack of a control condition.
Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of the Collaborative Eyewitness Interview in real-world settings.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-226
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Criminal Psychology
Volume15
Issue number2
Early online date16 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2025

Funding

The authors thank all witnesses and interviewers willing to participate in their study. The authors appreciate the help from the Rijksrecherche and Dienst Regionale Recherche. The authors are particularly thankful to Rob Aartsen, who helped us collect our data and commented on our manuscript, as well as Hille de Graaf and Jacqueline Poot, who helped us collect our data and gave us advice on the data coding scheme. The authors are grateful to Nine van Eerde, who double-coded all transcripts. This work was supported by the Society in Science \u2013 Branco Weiss Fellowship awarded to Annelies Vredeveldt.

FundersFunder number
Rijksrecherche and Dienst Regionale Recherche
Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science

    Keywords

    • Collaboration
    • Interviewing
    • Cross-cuing
    • Error pruning
    • Eyewitness memory
    • Retrieval strategy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative interviewing of eyewitnesses: A field study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this