Colonization contests: How both accounting and law firms gain legitimacy in the market for forensic accounting

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Considerable research attention has been devoted to the processes of so-called colonization yet, in order to explain the success and transformation of large accounting firms into large conglomerate Professional Service Firms (PSFs). However, we still know little about how these processes may be contested. Drawing on a rhetorical perspective of legitimacy and on in-depth interviews with high-level members of leading accounting and law firms in the forensic accounting market in the Netherlands, our research identifies various rhetorical devices used by these firms to expand and/or defend their legitimacy in a common market, by simultaneously seeking to promote competition and collaboration. By showing how these rhetorical devices relate to the evolving field dynamics, this study provides a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the desired outcomes and primary means of achieving them that are central to colonization contests between PSFs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-71
JournalJournal of Professions and Organization
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Accounting firms
Rhetoric
Legitimacy
Law firms
Colonization
Contests
Professional service firms
Conglomerate
The Netherlands
In-depth interviews

Cite this

@article{8bb01ad7211d470a9c9cfa60589d2a02,
title = "Colonization contests: How both accounting and law firms gain legitimacy in the market for forensic accounting",
abstract = "Considerable research attention has been devoted to the processes of so-called colonization yet, in order to explain the success and transformation of large accounting firms into large conglomerate Professional Service Firms (PSFs). However, we still know little about how these processes may be contested. Drawing on a rhetorical perspective of legitimacy and on in-depth interviews with high-level members of leading accounting and law firms in the forensic accounting market in the Netherlands, our research identifies various rhetorical devices used by these firms to expand and/or defend their legitimacy in a common market, by simultaneously seeking to promote competition and collaboration. By showing how these rhetorical devices relate to the evolving field dynamics, this study provides a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the desired outcomes and primary means of achieving them that are central to colonization contests between PSFs.",
author = "Yvette Taminiau and H.S. Heusinkveld",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/jpo/joz001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "49--71",
journal = "Journal of Professions and Organization",
issn = "2051-8803",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colonization contests: How both accounting and law firms gain legitimacy in the market for forensic accounting

AU - Taminiau, Yvette

AU - Heusinkveld, H.S.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Considerable research attention has been devoted to the processes of so-called colonization yet, in order to explain the success and transformation of large accounting firms into large conglomerate Professional Service Firms (PSFs). However, we still know little about how these processes may be contested. Drawing on a rhetorical perspective of legitimacy and on in-depth interviews with high-level members of leading accounting and law firms in the forensic accounting market in the Netherlands, our research identifies various rhetorical devices used by these firms to expand and/or defend their legitimacy in a common market, by simultaneously seeking to promote competition and collaboration. By showing how these rhetorical devices relate to the evolving field dynamics, this study provides a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the desired outcomes and primary means of achieving them that are central to colonization contests between PSFs.

AB - Considerable research attention has been devoted to the processes of so-called colonization yet, in order to explain the success and transformation of large accounting firms into large conglomerate Professional Service Firms (PSFs). However, we still know little about how these processes may be contested. Drawing on a rhetorical perspective of legitimacy and on in-depth interviews with high-level members of leading accounting and law firms in the forensic accounting market in the Netherlands, our research identifies various rhetorical devices used by these firms to expand and/or defend their legitimacy in a common market, by simultaneously seeking to promote competition and collaboration. By showing how these rhetorical devices relate to the evolving field dynamics, this study provides a deeper and more nuanced understanding of the desired outcomes and primary means of achieving them that are central to colonization contests between PSFs.

U2 - 10.1093/jpo/joz001

DO - 10.1093/jpo/joz001

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 49

EP - 71

JO - Journal of Professions and Organization

JF - Journal of Professions and Organization

SN - 2051-8803

IS - 1

ER -