Combined EEG-fNIRS decoding of motor attempt and imagery for brain switch control: An offline study in patients with tetraplegia

Y. Blokland, L. Spyrou, D. Thijssen, T. Eijsvogels, W. Colier, M. Floor-Westerdijk, R. Vlek, J. Bruhn, J. Farquhar

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Combining electrophysiological and hemodynamic features is a novel approach for improving current performance of brain switches based on sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). This study was conducted with a dual purpose: to test the feasibility of using a combined electroencephalogram/functional near-infrared spectroscopy (EEG-fNIRS) SMR-based brain switch in patients with tetraplegia, and to examine the performance difference between motor imagery and motor attempt for this user group. A general improvement was found when using both EEG and fNIRS features for classification as compared to using the single-modality EEG classifier, with average classification rates of 79% for attempted movement and 70% for imagined movement. For the control group, rates of 87% and 79% were obtained, respectively, where the 'attempted movement' condition was replaced with 'actual movement.' A combined EEG-fNIRS system might be especially beneficial for users who lack sufficient control of current EEG-based brain switches. The average classification performance in the patient group for attempted movement was significantly higher than for imagined movement using the EEG-only as well as the combined classifier, arguing for the case of a paradigm shift in current brain switch research. © 2013 IEEE.
Original languageEnglish
Article number6678785
Pages (from-to)222-229
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combined EEG-fNIRS decoding of motor attempt and imagery for brain switch control: An offline study in patients with tetraplegia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this