Different Types and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Acute Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: a network meta-analysis

Xinyu Zhou, Yuqing Zhang, Toshiaki A. Furukawa, Pim Cuijpers, Juncai Pu, John R. Weisz, Lining Yang, Sarah E. Hetrick, Cinzia Del Giovane, David Cohen, Anthony C. James, Shuai Yuan, Craig Whittington, Xiaofeng Jiang, Teng Teng, Andrea Cipriani*, Peng Xie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Importance Anxiety disorders are common in children and adolescents, and uncertainty remains regarding the optimal strategy of psychotherapies in this population.

Objective To compare and rank the different types of psychotherapies and the different ways of delivering psychological treatments for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.

Data Sources PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ProQuest Dissertations, LILACS (Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde), international trial registers, and US Food and Drug Administration reports were searched from inception to November 30, 2017.

Study Selection Randomized clinical trials that compared any structured psychotherapy with another psychotherapy or a control condition for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents were selected.

Data Extraction and Synthesis Four researchers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment. Pairwise meta-analyses and Bayesian network meta-analysis within the random-effects model were used to synthesize data.

Main Outcomes and Measures Efficacy (change in anxiety symptoms) posttreatment and at follow-up, acceptability (all-cause discontinuation), and quality of life and functional improvement were measured. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Results A total of 101 unique trials including 6625 unique participants compared 11 different psychotherapies with 4 specific control conditions. The certainty of evidence was rated as low or very low for most comparisons. For efficacy, most psychotherapies were significantly more effective than the wait list condition posttreatment (standardized mean difference [SMD], −1.43 to −0.61) and at the longest follow-up (SMD, −1.84 to −1.64). However, only group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was significantly more effective than the other psychotherapies and all control conditions posttreatment. For acceptability, bibliotherapy CBT had significantly more all-cause discontinuations than some psychotherapies and control conditions (range of odds ratios, 2.48-9.32). In terms of quality of life and functional improvement, CBT (delivered in different ways) was significantly beneficial compared with psychological placebo and the wait list condition (SMDs, 0.73 to 1.99).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-50
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA Psychiatry
Volume76
Issue number1
Early online date31 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Different Types and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Acute Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: a network meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this