Comparative performance analysis of European airports by means of extended data envelopment analysis

S. Suzuki, P. Nijkamp, E. Pels, P. Rietveld

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has become an established approach for analyzing and comparing efficiency results of corporate organizations or economic agents. It has also found wide application in comparative studies on airport efficiency. The standard DEA approach to comparative airport efficiency analysis has two feeble elements, viz. a methodological weakness and a substantive weakness. The methodological weakness originates from the choice of uniform efficiency improvement assessment, whereas the substantive weakness in airport efficiency analysis concerns the insufficient attention for short-term and long-term adjustment possibilities in the production inputs determining airport efficiency. The present paper aims to address both flaws by doing the following: (i) designing a data-instigated distance friction minimization (DFM) model as a generalization of the standard Banker-Charnes-Cooper model with a view to the development of a more appropriate efficiency improvement projection model in the Banker-Charnes-Cooper version of DEA and (ii) including as factor inputs also lumpy or rigid factors that are characterized by short-term indivisibility or inertia (and hence not suitable for short-run flexible adjustment in new efficiency stages), as is the case for runways of airports. This so-called fixed factor case will be included in the DFM submodel of the DEA. This extended DEA - with a DFM and a fixed factor component - will be applied to a comparative performance analysis of several major airports in Europe. Finally, our comparative study on airport efficiency analysis will be extended by incorporating also the added value of the presence of shopping facilities at airports for their relative economic performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-202
JournalJournal of Advanced Transportation
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Data envelopment analysis
Airports
Friction
Performance analysis
Airport efficiency
Economics
Factors
Efficiency analysis
Defects

Cite this

@article{f6daddd52653432b8089765ba92ed8cf,
title = "Comparative performance analysis of European airports by means of extended data envelopment analysis",
abstract = "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has become an established approach for analyzing and comparing efficiency results of corporate organizations or economic agents. It has also found wide application in comparative studies on airport efficiency. The standard DEA approach to comparative airport efficiency analysis has two feeble elements, viz. a methodological weakness and a substantive weakness. The methodological weakness originates from the choice of uniform efficiency improvement assessment, whereas the substantive weakness in airport efficiency analysis concerns the insufficient attention for short-term and long-term adjustment possibilities in the production inputs determining airport efficiency. The present paper aims to address both flaws by doing the following: (i) designing a data-instigated distance friction minimization (DFM) model as a generalization of the standard Banker-Charnes-Cooper model with a view to the development of a more appropriate efficiency improvement projection model in the Banker-Charnes-Cooper version of DEA and (ii) including as factor inputs also lumpy or rigid factors that are characterized by short-term indivisibility or inertia (and hence not suitable for short-run flexible adjustment in new efficiency stages), as is the case for runways of airports. This so-called fixed factor case will be included in the DFM submodel of the DEA. This extended DEA - with a DFM and a fixed factor component - will be applied to a comparative performance analysis of several major airports in Europe. Finally, our comparative study on airport efficiency analysis will be extended by incorporating also the added value of the presence of shopping facilities at airports for their relative economic performance. Copyright {\circledC} 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "S. Suzuki and P. Nijkamp and E. Pels and P. Rietveld",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/atr.204",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "185--202",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Transportation",
issn = "2042-3195",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

Comparative performance analysis of European airports by means of extended data envelopment analysis. / Suzuki, S.; Nijkamp, P.; Pels, E.; Rietveld, P.

In: Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2014, p. 185-202.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative performance analysis of European airports by means of extended data envelopment analysis

AU - Suzuki, S.

AU - Nijkamp, P.

AU - Pels, E.

AU - Rietveld, P.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has become an established approach for analyzing and comparing efficiency results of corporate organizations or economic agents. It has also found wide application in comparative studies on airport efficiency. The standard DEA approach to comparative airport efficiency analysis has two feeble elements, viz. a methodological weakness and a substantive weakness. The methodological weakness originates from the choice of uniform efficiency improvement assessment, whereas the substantive weakness in airport efficiency analysis concerns the insufficient attention for short-term and long-term adjustment possibilities in the production inputs determining airport efficiency. The present paper aims to address both flaws by doing the following: (i) designing a data-instigated distance friction minimization (DFM) model as a generalization of the standard Banker-Charnes-Cooper model with a view to the development of a more appropriate efficiency improvement projection model in the Banker-Charnes-Cooper version of DEA and (ii) including as factor inputs also lumpy or rigid factors that are characterized by short-term indivisibility or inertia (and hence not suitable for short-run flexible adjustment in new efficiency stages), as is the case for runways of airports. This so-called fixed factor case will be included in the DFM submodel of the DEA. This extended DEA - with a DFM and a fixed factor component - will be applied to a comparative performance analysis of several major airports in Europe. Finally, our comparative study on airport efficiency analysis will be extended by incorporating also the added value of the presence of shopping facilities at airports for their relative economic performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has become an established approach for analyzing and comparing efficiency results of corporate organizations or economic agents. It has also found wide application in comparative studies on airport efficiency. The standard DEA approach to comparative airport efficiency analysis has two feeble elements, viz. a methodological weakness and a substantive weakness. The methodological weakness originates from the choice of uniform efficiency improvement assessment, whereas the substantive weakness in airport efficiency analysis concerns the insufficient attention for short-term and long-term adjustment possibilities in the production inputs determining airport efficiency. The present paper aims to address both flaws by doing the following: (i) designing a data-instigated distance friction minimization (DFM) model as a generalization of the standard Banker-Charnes-Cooper model with a view to the development of a more appropriate efficiency improvement projection model in the Banker-Charnes-Cooper version of DEA and (ii) including as factor inputs also lumpy or rigid factors that are characterized by short-term indivisibility or inertia (and hence not suitable for short-run flexible adjustment in new efficiency stages), as is the case for runways of airports. This so-called fixed factor case will be included in the DFM submodel of the DEA. This extended DEA - with a DFM and a fixed factor component - will be applied to a comparative performance analysis of several major airports in Europe. Finally, our comparative study on airport efficiency analysis will be extended by incorporating also the added value of the presence of shopping facilities at airports for their relative economic performance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/atr.204

DO - 10.1002/atr.204

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 185

EP - 202

JO - Journal of Advanced Transportation

JF - Journal of Advanced Transportation

SN - 2042-3195

IS - 3

ER -