Comparatives in melanesia: Concentric circles of convergence

Lourens de Vries, Antoinette Schapper

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Using a sample of 116 languages, this article investigates the typology of comparative constructions and their distribution in Melanesia, one of the world's least-understood linguistic areas. We present a rigorous definition of a comparative construction as a “comparative concept”, thereby excluding many constructions which have been considered functionally comparatives in Melanesia. Conjoined comparatives are shown to dominate at the core of the area on the island of New Guinea, while (monoclausal) exceed comparatives are found in the maritime regions around New Guinea. Outside of Melanesia adpositional and other comparative constructions including particle comparatives are most frequent in Austronesian languages. The unity of the conjoined comparative type in the core Melanesian area illustrates that, while morpho-syntactic profiles of Melanesian languages are heterogenous, significant convergence in the “ways of saying things” can be found across the region. Additionally, we find no cases of clause chaining constructions being used for encoding comparatives, even in canonical clause chaining languages of central New Guinea. Our findings thus offer no support for Stassen's claim of a correlation between temporal chaining type and comparative construction type. Instead we suggest that an areal preference for mini-clauses may explain the dominance of the conjoined comparative in Melanesia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)437-494
Number of pages58
JournalLinguistic Typology
Volume22
Issue number3
Early online date16 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Melanesia
New Guinea
language
typology
linguistics
Language
Clause

Keywords

  • Areal typology
  • Austronesian
  • Comparative constructions
  • Melanesia
  • Papuan

Cite this

de Vries, Lourens ; Schapper, Antoinette. / Comparatives in melanesia : Concentric circles of convergence. In: Linguistic Typology. 2018 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 437-494.
@article{af347e5b903d4037828037a8e8e6d571,
title = "Comparatives in melanesia: Concentric circles of convergence",
abstract = "Using a sample of 116 languages, this article investigates the typology of comparative constructions and their distribution in Melanesia, one of the world's least-understood linguistic areas. We present a rigorous definition of a comparative construction as a “comparative concept”, thereby excluding many constructions which have been considered functionally comparatives in Melanesia. Conjoined comparatives are shown to dominate at the core of the area on the island of New Guinea, while (monoclausal) exceed comparatives are found in the maritime regions around New Guinea. Outside of Melanesia adpositional and other comparative constructions including particle comparatives are most frequent in Austronesian languages. The unity of the conjoined comparative type in the core Melanesian area illustrates that, while morpho-syntactic profiles of Melanesian languages are heterogenous, significant convergence in the “ways of saying things” can be found across the region. Additionally, we find no cases of clause chaining constructions being used for encoding comparatives, even in canonical clause chaining languages of central New Guinea. Our findings thus offer no support for Stassen's claim of a correlation between temporal chaining type and comparative construction type. Instead we suggest that an areal preference for mini-clauses may explain the dominance of the conjoined comparative in Melanesia.",
keywords = "Areal typology, Austronesian, Comparative constructions, Melanesia, Papuan",
author = "{de Vries}, Lourens and Antoinette Schapper",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1515/lingty-2018-0015",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "437--494",
journal = "Linguistic Typology",
issn = "1613-415X",
publisher = "De Gruyter",
number = "3",

}

Comparatives in melanesia : Concentric circles of convergence. / de Vries, Lourens; Schapper, Antoinette.

In: Linguistic Typology, Vol. 22, No. 3, 25.10.2018, p. 437-494.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparatives in melanesia

T2 - Concentric circles of convergence

AU - de Vries, Lourens

AU - Schapper, Antoinette

PY - 2018/10/25

Y1 - 2018/10/25

N2 - Using a sample of 116 languages, this article investigates the typology of comparative constructions and their distribution in Melanesia, one of the world's least-understood linguistic areas. We present a rigorous definition of a comparative construction as a “comparative concept”, thereby excluding many constructions which have been considered functionally comparatives in Melanesia. Conjoined comparatives are shown to dominate at the core of the area on the island of New Guinea, while (monoclausal) exceed comparatives are found in the maritime regions around New Guinea. Outside of Melanesia adpositional and other comparative constructions including particle comparatives are most frequent in Austronesian languages. The unity of the conjoined comparative type in the core Melanesian area illustrates that, while morpho-syntactic profiles of Melanesian languages are heterogenous, significant convergence in the “ways of saying things” can be found across the region. Additionally, we find no cases of clause chaining constructions being used for encoding comparatives, even in canonical clause chaining languages of central New Guinea. Our findings thus offer no support for Stassen's claim of a correlation between temporal chaining type and comparative construction type. Instead we suggest that an areal preference for mini-clauses may explain the dominance of the conjoined comparative in Melanesia.

AB - Using a sample of 116 languages, this article investigates the typology of comparative constructions and their distribution in Melanesia, one of the world's least-understood linguistic areas. We present a rigorous definition of a comparative construction as a “comparative concept”, thereby excluding many constructions which have been considered functionally comparatives in Melanesia. Conjoined comparatives are shown to dominate at the core of the area on the island of New Guinea, while (monoclausal) exceed comparatives are found in the maritime regions around New Guinea. Outside of Melanesia adpositional and other comparative constructions including particle comparatives are most frequent in Austronesian languages. The unity of the conjoined comparative type in the core Melanesian area illustrates that, while morpho-syntactic profiles of Melanesian languages are heterogenous, significant convergence in the “ways of saying things” can be found across the region. Additionally, we find no cases of clause chaining constructions being used for encoding comparatives, even in canonical clause chaining languages of central New Guinea. Our findings thus offer no support for Stassen's claim of a correlation between temporal chaining type and comparative construction type. Instead we suggest that an areal preference for mini-clauses may explain the dominance of the conjoined comparative in Melanesia.

KW - Areal typology

KW - Austronesian

KW - Comparative constructions

KW - Melanesia

KW - Papuan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055632707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055632707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/lingty-2018-0015

DO - 10.1515/lingty-2018-0015

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 437

EP - 494

JO - Linguistic Typology

JF - Linguistic Typology

SN - 1613-415X

IS - 3

ER -