TY - GEN
T1 - Comparing hyperprior distributions to estimate variance components for interrater reliability coefficients
AU - Hove, D.
AU - Jorgensen, T.D.
AU - van der Ark, L.A.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.Interrater reliability (IRR) is often estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation of Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate ICCs has several benefits over traditional approaches such as analysis of variance or maximum likelihood estimation. However, estimation of ICCs with small sample sizes and variance parameters close to zero, which are typical conditions in studies for which the IRR should be estimated, remains problematic in this MCMC approach. The estimation of the variance components that are used to estimate ICCs can heavily depend on the hyperprior distributions specified for these random-effect parameters. In this study, we explore the effect of a uniform and half-t hyperprior distribution on bias, coverage, and efficiency of the random-effect parameters and ICCs. The results indicated that a half-t distribution outperforms a uniform distribution but that slightly increasing the number of raters in a study is more influential than the choice of hyperprior distributions. We discuss implications and directions for future research.
AB - © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.Interrater reliability (IRR) is often estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation of Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate ICCs has several benefits over traditional approaches such as analysis of variance or maximum likelihood estimation. However, estimation of ICCs with small sample sizes and variance parameters close to zero, which are typical conditions in studies for which the IRR should be estimated, remains problematic in this MCMC approach. The estimation of the variance components that are used to estimate ICCs can heavily depend on the hyperprior distributions specified for these random-effect parameters. In this study, we explore the effect of a uniform and half-t hyperprior distribution on bias, coverage, and efficiency of the random-effect parameters and ICCs. The results indicated that a half-t distribution outperforms a uniform distribution but that slightly increasing the number of raters in a study is more influential than the choice of hyperprior distributions. We discuss implications and directions for future research.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85089312969
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85089312969#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-43469-4_7
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-43469-4_7
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9783030434687
T3 - Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics
SP - 79
EP - 93
BT - Quantitative Psychology - 84th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, IMPS 2019
A2 - Wiberg, M.
A2 - Molenaar, D.
A2 - González, J.
A2 - Böckenholt, U.
A2 - Kim, J.-S.
PB - Springer
T2 - 84th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, IMPS 2019
Y2 - 15 July 2019 through 19 July 2019
ER -