Comparing protests and demonstrators in times of austerity: regular and occasional protesters in universalistic and particularistic mobilisations

J.M. Sabucedo, C. Gómez, J. van Stekelenburg, P.G. Klandermans

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The recent economic crisis shaped a new wave of protest in Europe mobilising
thousands of people. Austerity measures brought not only the ‘usual suspects’ onto the streets, they also awoke less frequent demonstrators. What brought all these people to the streets? Are their motivations the same for participation in all demonstrations? We compare participants in two types of mobilisations against austerity: those called particularistic (which are reactions to particular anti-austerity issues), and those universalistic (which address much broader issues such as questioning the political system). We also compare two typologies of participants taking into account their participation history: regular and occasional protesters. Employing a two-by-two design defined by type of demonstration (Particularistic vs. Universalistic) and the individual’s participation history (Occasionals vs. Regulars), we found that the differences between demonstrations were smaller than those within types of protesters. Nevertheless, even in this period of hardship, motivation to participate in particularistic or universalistic protests differ depending on the perceptions of political system, ideological positioning and organisational embeddedness. Interaction analyses showed that different levels of identity, trust in institutions and satisfaction with
democracy are crucial in driving people to participate in different types of
demonstrations as occasionals or regulars.
LanguageEnglish
Pages704-720
JournalSocial Movement Studies
Volume16
Issue number6
Early online date21 Jun 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - 21 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

protest
mobilization
political system
participation
history
economic crisis
typology
democracy
time
interaction

Cite this

@article{3f3a9aa2a8b14b02a9db018dcb4b7a4e,
title = "Comparing protests and demonstrators in times of austerity: regular and occasional protesters in universalistic and particularistic mobilisations",
abstract = "The recent economic crisis shaped a new wave of protest in Europe mobilisingthousands of people. Austerity measures brought not only the ‘usual suspects’ onto the streets, they also awoke less frequent demonstrators. What brought all these people to the streets? Are their motivations the same for participation in all demonstrations? We compare participants in two types of mobilisations against austerity: those called particularistic (which are reactions to particular anti-austerity issues), and those universalistic (which address much broader issues such as questioning the political system). We also compare two typologies of participants taking into account their participation history: regular and occasional protesters. Employing a two-by-two design defined by type of demonstration (Particularistic vs. Universalistic) and the individual’s participation history (Occasionals vs. Regulars), we found that the differences between demonstrations were smaller than those within types of protesters. Nevertheless, even in this period of hardship, motivation to participate in particularistic or universalistic protests differ depending on the perceptions of political system, ideological positioning and organisational embeddedness. Interaction analyses showed that different levels of identity, trust in institutions and satisfaction withdemocracy are crucial in driving people to participate in different types ofdemonstrations as occasionals or regulars.",
author = "J.M. Sabucedo and C. G{\'o}mez and {van Stekelenburg}, J. and P.G. Klandermans",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/14742837.2017.1338940",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "704--720",
journal = "Social Movement Studies",
issn = "1474-2837",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

Comparing protests and demonstrators in times of austerity: regular and occasional protesters in universalistic and particularistic mobilisations. / Sabucedo, J.M.; Gómez, C.; van Stekelenburg, J.; Klandermans, P.G.

In: Social Movement Studies, Vol. 16, No. 6, 21.06.2017, p. 704-720.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing protests and demonstrators in times of austerity: regular and occasional protesters in universalistic and particularistic mobilisations

AU - Sabucedo,J.M.

AU - Gómez,C.

AU - van Stekelenburg,J.

AU - Klandermans,P.G.

PY - 2017/6/21

Y1 - 2017/6/21

N2 - The recent economic crisis shaped a new wave of protest in Europe mobilisingthousands of people. Austerity measures brought not only the ‘usual suspects’ onto the streets, they also awoke less frequent demonstrators. What brought all these people to the streets? Are their motivations the same for participation in all demonstrations? We compare participants in two types of mobilisations against austerity: those called particularistic (which are reactions to particular anti-austerity issues), and those universalistic (which address much broader issues such as questioning the political system). We also compare two typologies of participants taking into account their participation history: regular and occasional protesters. Employing a two-by-two design defined by type of demonstration (Particularistic vs. Universalistic) and the individual’s participation history (Occasionals vs. Regulars), we found that the differences between demonstrations were smaller than those within types of protesters. Nevertheless, even in this period of hardship, motivation to participate in particularistic or universalistic protests differ depending on the perceptions of political system, ideological positioning and organisational embeddedness. Interaction analyses showed that different levels of identity, trust in institutions and satisfaction withdemocracy are crucial in driving people to participate in different types ofdemonstrations as occasionals or regulars.

AB - The recent economic crisis shaped a new wave of protest in Europe mobilisingthousands of people. Austerity measures brought not only the ‘usual suspects’ onto the streets, they also awoke less frequent demonstrators. What brought all these people to the streets? Are their motivations the same for participation in all demonstrations? We compare participants in two types of mobilisations against austerity: those called particularistic (which are reactions to particular anti-austerity issues), and those universalistic (which address much broader issues such as questioning the political system). We also compare two typologies of participants taking into account their participation history: regular and occasional protesters. Employing a two-by-two design defined by type of demonstration (Particularistic vs. Universalistic) and the individual’s participation history (Occasionals vs. Regulars), we found that the differences between demonstrations were smaller than those within types of protesters. Nevertheless, even in this period of hardship, motivation to participate in particularistic or universalistic protests differ depending on the perceptions of political system, ideological positioning and organisational embeddedness. Interaction analyses showed that different levels of identity, trust in institutions and satisfaction withdemocracy are crucial in driving people to participate in different types ofdemonstrations as occasionals or regulars.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1338940

U2 - 10.1080/14742837.2017.1338940

DO - 10.1080/14742837.2017.1338940

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 704

EP - 720

JO - Social Movement Studies

T2 - Social Movement Studies

JF - Social Movement Studies

SN - 1474-2837

IS - 6

ER -