Comparison of excitation energy transfer in cyanobacterial photosystem I in solution and immobilized on conducting glass

Sebastian Szewczyk, Wojciech Giera, Sandrine D'Haene, Rienk van Grondelle, Krzysztof Gibasiewicz

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Excitation energy transfer in monomeric and trimeric forms of photosystem I (PSI) from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in solution or immobilized on FTO conducting glass was compared using time-resolved fluorescence. Deposition of PSI on glass preserves bi-exponential excitation decay of similar to 4-7 and similar to 21-25 ps lifetimes characteristic of PSI in solution. The faster phase was assigned in part to photochemical quenching (charge separation) of excited bulk chlorophylls and in part to energy transfer from bulk to low-energy (red) chlorophylls. The slower phase was assigned to photochemical quenching of the excitation equilibrated over bulk and red chlorophylls. The main differences between dissolved and immobilized PSI (iPSI) are: (1) the average excitation decay in iPSI is about 11 ps, which is faster by a few ps than for PSI in solution due to significantly faster excitation quenching of bulk chlorophylls by charge separation (similar to 10 ps instead of similar to 15 ps) accompanied by slightly weaker coupling of bulk and red chlorophylls; (2) the number of red chlorophylls in monomeric PSI increases twice-from 3 in solution to 6 after immobilization-as a result of interaction with neighboring monomers and conducting glass; despite the increased number of red chlorophylls, the excitation decay accelerates in iPSI; (3) the number of red chlorophylls in trimeric PSI is 4 (per monomer) and remains unchanged after immobilization; (4) in all the samples under study, the free energy gap between mean red (emission at similar to 710 nm) and mean bulk (emission at similar to 686 nm) emitting states of chlorophylls was estimated at a similar level of 17-27 meV. All these observations indicate that despite slight modifications, dried PSI complexes adsorbed on the FTO surface remain fully functional in terms of excitation energy transfer and primary charge separation that is particularly important in the view of photovoltaic applications of this photosystem.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-126
Number of pages16
JournalPhotosynthesis Research
Volume132
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Funding

S.S. acknowledges financial support from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education via the "Diamond Grant" (Diamentowy Grant) programme, Grant No. DI 2011 004141. W.G. acknowledges funding from LASERLAB-EUROPE III (Grant Agreement No. 284464, EU FP7). R.v.G. acknowledges financial support from VU University Amsterdam, the Laserlab-Europe Consortium, the TOP Grant (700.58.305) from the Foundation of Chemical Sciences part of NWO, the advanced investigator Grant (267333, PHOTPROT) from the European Research Council, the EU FP7 Project PAPETS (GA 323901). R.v.G. gratefully acknowledges his Academy Professor grant from the Netherlands Royal Academy of Sciences (KNAW). K.G. acknowledges financial support from the National Science Center, Poland (project entitled "Bio-semiconductor hybrids for photovoltaic cells" No. 2012/07/B/NZ1/02639.

FundersFunder number
LASERLAB-EUROPE III
Laserlab-Europe Consortium700.58.305
Netherlands Royal Academy of Sciences
PHOTPROT
Seventh Framework Programme267333, 323901, 284464
European Research Council
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Narodowe Centrum Nauki2012/07/B/NZ1/02639
Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa WyższegoDI 2011 004141
Seventh Framework Programme

    Keywords

    • Biophotovoltaics
    • Cyanobacteria
    • Excitation energy transfer
    • Photosystem I
    • Photovoltaics
    • Red chlorophylls
    • Streak camera
    • Time-resolved fluorescence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of excitation energy transfer in cyanobacterial photosystem I in solution and immobilized on conducting glass'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this