TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum
T2 - An individual participant data meta-analysis
AU - Levis, Brooke
AU - McMillan, Dean
AU - Sun, Ying
AU - He, Chen
AU - Rice, Danielle B.
AU - Krishnan, Ankur
AU - Wu, Yin
AU - Azar, Marleine
AU - Sanchez, Tatiana A.
AU - Chiovitti, Matthew J.
AU - Bhandari, Parash Mani
AU - Neupane, Dipika
AU - Saadat, Nazanin
AU - Riehm, Kira E.
AU - Imran, Mahrukh
AU - Boruff, Jill T.
AU - Cuijpers, Pim
AU - Gilbody, Simon
AU - Ioannidis, John P.A.
AU - Kloda, Lorie A.
AU - Patten, Scott B.
AU - Shrier, Ian
AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C.
AU - Comeau, Liane
AU - Mitchell, Nicholas D.
AU - Tonelli, Marcello
AU - Vigod, Simone N.
AU - Aceti, Franca
AU - Alvarado, Rubén
AU - Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme
AU - Bakare, Muideen O.
AU - Barnes, Jacqueline
AU - Beck, Cheryl Tatano
AU - Bindt, Carola
AU - Boyce, Philip M.
AU - Bunevicius, Adomas
AU - Couto, Tiago Castro e.
AU - Chaudron, Linda H.
AU - Correa, Humberto
AU - de Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro
AU - Eapen, Valsamma
AU - Fernandes, Michelle
AU - Figueiredo, Barbara
AU - Fisher, Jane R.W.
AU - Garcia-Esteve, Lluïsa
AU - Giardinelli, Lisa
AU - Helle, Nadine
AU - Howard, Louise M.
AU - Khalifa, Dina Sami
AU - Kohlhoff, Jane
AU - Kusminskas, Laima
AU - Kozinszky, Zoltán
AU - Lelli, Lorenzo
AU - Leonardou, Angeliki A.
AU - Lewis, Beth A.
AU - Maes, Michael
AU - Meuti, Valentina
AU - Nakić Radoš, Sandra
AU - Navarro García, Purificación
AU - Nishi, Daisuke
AU - Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel
AU - Robertson-Blackmore, Emma
AU - Rochat, Tamsen J.
AU - Rowe, Heather J.
AU - Siu, Bonnie W.M.
AU - Skalkidou, Alkistis
AU - Stein, Alan
AU - Stewart, Robert C.
AU - Su, Kuan Pin
AU - Sundström-Poromaa, Inger
AU - Tadinac, Meri
AU - Tandon, S. Darius
AU - Tendais, Iva
AU - Thiagayson, Pavaani
AU - Töreki, Annamária
AU - Torres-Giménez, Anna
AU - Tran, Thach D.
AU - Trevillion, Kylee
AU - Turner, Katherine
AU - Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M.
AU - Wynter, Karen
AU - Yonkers, Kimberly A.
AU - Benedetti, Andrea
AU - Thombs, Brett D.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
AB - Objectives: A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum. Methods: Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics. Results: Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased. Conclusion: Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.
KW - depressive disorders
KW - diagnostic interviews
KW - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
KW - individual participant data meta-analysis
KW - major depression
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073948478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073948478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mpr.1803
DO - 10.1002/mpr.1803
M3 - Article
C2 - 31568624
AN - SCOPUS:85073948478
VL - 28
JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
SN - 1049-8931
IS - 4
M1 - e1803
ER -