Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xi Wang, Hui Chen, Shaohua Ge, Kaan Orhan, Paul van der Stelt, Xie Qi Shi

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are widely used as noncontinuous positive airway pressure treatment options for obstructive sleep apnea, but they are associated with some side effects. To figure out the side effects related to MAD design and aid clinical decision-making, this systematic review compares the types and severity of side effects caused by both the adjustable and the nonadjustable MADs. METHODS: Three databases were searched until May 2024 and 26 relevant studies were eligible for inclusion. The side effects examined include dentoskeletal changes and issues related to the temporomandibular joint, masticatory muscles, or periodontium. RESULTS: Compared with adjustable MADs (overjet: mean difference [MD]: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.66-1.30; overbite: MD: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67-1.30), nonadjustable MADs show less change in overjet (MD: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.49-1.28) and overbite (MD: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.32-1.26). Adjustable MADs have less impact on temporomandibular joint and masticatory muscles than nonadjustable MADs. However, there were no significant differences in sella-nasion-A point (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.56), sella-nasion-B point (MD: 0.19, 95% CI: -0.28 to 0.67), or A-nasion-B point (MD: -0.14, 95% CI: -0.42 to 0.15) after treatment of either type of MAD. There were no signs of periodontitis or bone resorption observed after treatment with adjustable MAD. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide valuable information for clinicians in selecting an appropriate MAD. However, given the limitations of the current evidence, there is no single superior custom MAD design in terms of side effects at present. CITATION: Wang X, Chen H, Ge S, Orhan K, van der Stelt P, Shi X-Q. Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(8):1477-1486.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1486
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine
Volume21
Issue number8
Early online date1 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Funding

This work was supported by the International Orthodontics Foundation (grant number SDUZHJ20241367).

FundersFunder number
International Orthodontics FoundationSDUZHJ20241367

    Keywords

    • mandibular advancement device
    • meta-analysis
    • obstructive sleep apnea
    • side effects

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of side effects of different mandibular advancement devices for patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this