Abstract
Universities throughout Europe have adopted organisational strategies, structures, technologies, management instruments and values that are commonly found in the private sector. While these alleged managerial measures may be considered useful, and have a positive effect on the quality of teaching and research, there is also evidence of detrimental effects on primary tasks. The consequences of such managerial measures were investigated through 48 interviews with staff members at 10 universities in the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. The results were analysed and interpreted within the framework of institutional and professional theory, by linking them to three central themes: 'symbolic compliance', 'professional pragmatism' and 'formal instrumentality'. These themes explain why and how the respondents dissociated themselves from the managerial measures imposed upon them. This occurred often for pragmatic and occasionally for principled reasons. © 2012 Society for Research into Higher Education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 271-290 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Studies in Higher Education |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 25 May 2011 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- comparative research
- higher education
- institutionalism
- managerialism
- performance management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Compliance or pragmatism: how do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver