Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Two well-known response interference tasks are the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and comparable effects of current and previous stimulus type (congruent or incongruent) have been shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, we investigated whether interference and sequential trial effects also had comparable effects on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these effects interacted with the speed of responding using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequential trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by distracting flankers led to below-chance performance in the flanker task, but response activation by incongruent spatial location did not lead to below-chance performance in the spatial conflict task. The pattern of results hints at subtle differences in processing architecture between the tasks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-417
JournalAdvances in Cognitive Psychology
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Cite this

@article{eeac16e5fb404dc8bdc6fa19986e2ab6,
title = "Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.",
abstract = "Two well-known response interference tasks are the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and comparable effects of current and previous stimulus type (congruent or incongruent) have been shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, we investigated whether interference and sequential trial effects also had comparable effects on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these effects interacted with the speed of responding using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequential trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by distracting flankers led to below-chance performance in the flanker task, but response activation by incongruent spatial location did not lead to below-chance performance in the spatial conflict task. The pattern of results hints at subtle differences in processing architecture between the tasks.",
author = "J.F. Stins and T.J.C. Polderman and D.I. Boomsma and {de Geus}, E.J.C.",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.2478/v10053-008-0005-4",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "409--417",
journal = "Advances in Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "1895-1171",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task.

AU - Stins, J.F.

AU - Polderman, T.J.C.

AU - Boomsma, D.I.

AU - de Geus, E.J.C.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Two well-known response interference tasks are the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and comparable effects of current and previous stimulus type (congruent or incongruent) have been shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, we investigated whether interference and sequential trial effects also had comparable effects on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these effects interacted with the speed of responding using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequential trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by distracting flankers led to below-chance performance in the flanker task, but response activation by incongruent spatial location did not lead to below-chance performance in the spatial conflict task. The pattern of results hints at subtle differences in processing architecture between the tasks.

AB - Two well-known response interference tasks are the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task. The tasks are logically equivalent, and comparable effects of current and previous stimulus type (congruent or incongruent) have been shown with regard to reaction time (RT). Here, we investigated whether interference and sequential trial effects also had comparable effects on accuracy. We specifically tested whether these effects interacted with the speed of responding using conditional accuracy functions (CAFs). The CAFs revealed that in both tasks congruency and sequential trial effects on accuracy are found only in trials with fast responses (< 600 ms). Sequential trial effects on accuracy were weaker for the flanker task than for the spatial conflict task. In very fast trials (< 400 ms) response activation by distracting flankers led to below-chance performance in the flanker task, but response activation by incongruent spatial location did not lead to below-chance performance in the spatial conflict task. The pattern of results hints at subtle differences in processing architecture between the tasks.

U2 - 10.2478/v10053-008-0005-4

DO - 10.2478/v10053-008-0005-4

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 409

EP - 417

JO - Advances in Cognitive Psychology

JF - Advances in Cognitive Psychology

SN - 1895-1171

IS - 3

ER -