Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.

W.L.J.M. Deville, F. Buntinx, L.M. Bouter, V.M. Montori, H.C.W. de Vet, D.A.W.M. van der Windt, P.D. Bezemer

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    162 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: Although guidelines for critical appraisal of diagnostic research and meta-analyses have already been published, these may be difficult to understand for clinical researchers or do not provide enough detailed information. METHODS: Development of guidelines based on a systematic review of the evidence in reports of systematic searches of the literature for diagnostic research, of methodological criteria to evaluate diagnostic research, of methods for statistical pooling of data on diagnostic accuracy, and of methods for exploring heterogeneity. RESULTS: Guidelines for conducting diagnostic systematic reviews are presented in a stepwise fashion and are followed by comments providing further information. Examples are given using the results of two systematic reviews on the accuracy of the urine dipstick in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections, and on the accuracy of the straight-leg-raising test in the diagnosis of intervertebral disc hernia.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)9
    Number of pages12
    JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
    Volume2
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this