Conflict and Power Games in a Multinational Corporation: Sensegiving as a Strategy of Preservation

Israel Drori, Shemuel Ellis

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we seek to extend existing understandings of how sensegiving is associated with conflict and power games. We look specifically at sensegiving by managers that promotes strategies and actions geared toward preserving their positions against change. Formulating a conceptual framework about sensegiving and power games in organizations may help to address a meaningful gap in the sensemaking/sensegiving literature. Although organizational members are continuously engaged in sensegiving for advocating certain strategies of action, a neglected issue is that members, and in particular managers, may look at sensegiving as a strategy to guard against change. In multinational companies (MNCs), for instance, boundary conditions - cultural and geographical differences - may draw attention to the nature of control and conflict between headquarters and subsidiaries and subsequently militate against substantial change. This assertion underlies our primary research question: Why and through what types of power games do managers of MNCs give sense to issues and events that help to maintain organizational inertia and legitimate behaviors and actions that curtail organizational change?

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Management Review
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Multinational corporations
Sensegiving
Managers
Multinational companies
Organizational change
Conceptual framework
Subsidiaries
Sensemaking
Boundary conditions
Organizational inertia
Headquarters

Keywords

  • multinational corporation
  • power games
  • sensegiving
  • sensemaking

Cite this

@article{20e6f925d1a5499e8e69da68474ffb2a,
title = "Conflict and Power Games in a Multinational Corporation: Sensegiving as a Strategy of Preservation",
abstract = "In this paper, we seek to extend existing understandings of how sensegiving is associated with conflict and power games. We look specifically at sensegiving by managers that promotes strategies and actions geared toward preserving their positions against change. Formulating a conceptual framework about sensegiving and power games in organizations may help to address a meaningful gap in the sensemaking/sensegiving literature. Although organizational members are continuously engaged in sensegiving for advocating certain strategies of action, a neglected issue is that members, and in particular managers, may look at sensegiving as a strategy to guard against change. In multinational companies (MNCs), for instance, boundary conditions - cultural and geographical differences - may draw attention to the nature of control and conflict between headquarters and subsidiaries and subsequently militate against substantial change. This assertion underlies our primary research question: Why and through what types of power games do managers of MNCs give sense to issues and events that help to maintain organizational inertia and legitimate behaviors and actions that curtail organizational change?",
keywords = "multinational corporation, power games, sensegiving, sensemaking",
author = "Israel Drori and Shemuel Ellis",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1740-4762.2010.01001.x",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "European Management Review",
issn = "1740-4754",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Conflict and Power Games in a Multinational Corporation : Sensegiving as a Strategy of Preservation. / Drori, Israel; Ellis, Shemuel.

In: European Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conflict and Power Games in a Multinational Corporation

T2 - Sensegiving as a Strategy of Preservation

AU - Drori, Israel

AU - Ellis, Shemuel

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - In this paper, we seek to extend existing understandings of how sensegiving is associated with conflict and power games. We look specifically at sensegiving by managers that promotes strategies and actions geared toward preserving their positions against change. Formulating a conceptual framework about sensegiving and power games in organizations may help to address a meaningful gap in the sensemaking/sensegiving literature. Although organizational members are continuously engaged in sensegiving for advocating certain strategies of action, a neglected issue is that members, and in particular managers, may look at sensegiving as a strategy to guard against change. In multinational companies (MNCs), for instance, boundary conditions - cultural and geographical differences - may draw attention to the nature of control and conflict between headquarters and subsidiaries and subsequently militate against substantial change. This assertion underlies our primary research question: Why and through what types of power games do managers of MNCs give sense to issues and events that help to maintain organizational inertia and legitimate behaviors and actions that curtail organizational change?

AB - In this paper, we seek to extend existing understandings of how sensegiving is associated with conflict and power games. We look specifically at sensegiving by managers that promotes strategies and actions geared toward preserving their positions against change. Formulating a conceptual framework about sensegiving and power games in organizations may help to address a meaningful gap in the sensemaking/sensegiving literature. Although organizational members are continuously engaged in sensegiving for advocating certain strategies of action, a neglected issue is that members, and in particular managers, may look at sensegiving as a strategy to guard against change. In multinational companies (MNCs), for instance, boundary conditions - cultural and geographical differences - may draw attention to the nature of control and conflict between headquarters and subsidiaries and subsequently militate against substantial change. This assertion underlies our primary research question: Why and through what types of power games do managers of MNCs give sense to issues and events that help to maintain organizational inertia and legitimate behaviors and actions that curtail organizational change?

KW - multinational corporation

KW - power games

KW - sensegiving

KW - sensemaking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954506047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954506047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2010.01001.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2010.01001.x

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - European Management Review

JF - European Management Review

SN - 1740-4754

IS - 1

ER -