TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project
T2 - Checklist for reporting and critically appraising studies using EMG (CEDE-Check)
AU - Besomi, Manuela
AU - Devecchi, Valter
AU - Falla, Deborah
AU - McGill, Kevin
AU - Kiernan, Matthew C.
AU - Merletti, Roberto
AU - van Dieën, Jaap H.
AU - Tucker, Kylie
AU - Clancy, Edward A.
AU - Søgaard, Karen
AU - Hug, François
AU - Carson, Richard G.
AU - Perreault, Eric
AU - Gandevia, Simon
AU - Besier, Thor
AU - Rothwell, John C.
AU - Enoka, Roger M.
AU - Holobar, Aleš
AU - Disselhorst-Klug, Catherine
AU - Wrigley, Tim
AU - Lowery, Madeleine
AU - Farina, Dario
AU - Hodges, Paul W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - The diversity in electromyography (EMG) techniques and their reporting present significant challenges across multiple disciplines in research and clinical practice, where EMG is commonly used. To address these challenges and augment the reproducibility and interpretation of studies using EMG, the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project has developed a checklist (CEDE-Check) to assist researchers to thoroughly report their EMG methodologies. Development involved a multi-stage Delphi process with seventeen EMG experts from various disciplines. After two rounds, consensus was achieved. The final CEDE-Check consists of forty items that address four critical areas that demand precise reporting when EMG is employed: the task investigated, electrode placement, recording electrode characteristics, and acquisition and pre-processing of EMG signals. This checklist aims to guide researchers to accurately report and critically appraise EMG studies, thereby promoting a standardised critical evaluation, and greater scientific rigor in research that uses EMG signals. This approach not only aims to facilitate interpretation of study results and comparisons between studies, but it is also expected to contribute to advancing research quality and facilitate clinical and other practical applications of knowledge generated through the use of EMG.
AB - The diversity in electromyography (EMG) techniques and their reporting present significant challenges across multiple disciplines in research and clinical practice, where EMG is commonly used. To address these challenges and augment the reproducibility and interpretation of studies using EMG, the Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project has developed a checklist (CEDE-Check) to assist researchers to thoroughly report their EMG methodologies. Development involved a multi-stage Delphi process with seventeen EMG experts from various disciplines. After two rounds, consensus was achieved. The final CEDE-Check consists of forty items that address four critical areas that demand precise reporting when EMG is employed: the task investigated, electrode placement, recording electrode characteristics, and acquisition and pre-processing of EMG signals. This checklist aims to guide researchers to accurately report and critically appraise EMG studies, thereby promoting a standardised critical evaluation, and greater scientific rigor in research that uses EMG signals. This approach not only aims to facilitate interpretation of study results and comparisons between studies, but it is also expected to contribute to advancing research quality and facilitate clinical and other practical applications of knowledge generated through the use of EMG.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188987276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188987276&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102874
DO - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102874
M3 - Article
C2 - 38547715
AN - SCOPUS:85188987276
SN - 1050-6411
VL - 76
SP - 1
EP - 7
JO - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
JF - Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
M1 - 102874
ER -