Conservative sex and benefits of transformation in Streptococcus pneumonia.

D.J.P. Engelmoer, I. Donaldson, D.E. Rozen

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Natural transformation has significant effects on bacterial genome evolution, but the evolutionary factors maintaining this mode of bacterial sex remain uncertain. Transformation is hypothesized to have both positive and negative evolutionary effects on bacteria. It can facilitate adaptation by combining beneficial mutations into a single individual, or reduce the mutational load by exposing deleterious alleles to natural selection. Alternatively, it may expose transformed cells to damaged or otherwise mutated environmental DNA and is energetically expensive. Here, we examine the long-term effects of transformation in the naturally competent species Streptococcus pneumoniae by evolving populations of wild-type and competence-deficient strains in chemostats for 1000 generations. Half of these populations were exposed to periodic mild stress to examine context-dependent benefits of transformation. We find that competence reduces fitness gain under benign conditions; however, these costs are reduced in the presence of periodic stress. Using whole genome re-sequencing, we show that competent populations fix fewer new mutations and that competence prevents the emergence of mutators. Our results show that during evolution in benign conditions competence helps maintain genome stability but is evolutionary costly; however, during periods of stress this same conservativism enables cells to retain fitness in the face of new mutations, showing for the first time that the benefits of transformation are context dependent. © 2013 Engelmoer et al.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)e1003758
    JournalPlos Pathogens
    Volume11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative sex and benefits of transformation in Streptococcus pneumonia.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this