Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection

B.T. Rutjens, Bojana Većkalov

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We review recent work on the relationship between science rejection and conspiracy beliefs. We distinguish between conspiracy beliefs about science specifically and the link between general conspiracist worldviews and science rejection. The first imply the scientific community as the center of a conspiratorial endeavor to misrepresent scientific findings. We outline several potential contributors to these beliefs: science is a social enterprise; its policy implications can clash with deeply held personal beliefs; science is inherently uncertain. Second, more general conspiracist thinking and worldviews also contribute to science rejection, for example in the domains of climate change, vaccination and genetic modification. This could be exacerbated by several cognitive biases associated with conspiratorial thinking. Finally, we briefly review pathways to curb (conspiratorial) science rejection.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101392
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychology
Volume46
Early online date14 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Funding

This writing of this paper was supported by funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 849125).

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020
European Research Council
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme849125

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Conspiracy beliefs and science rejection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this