Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constitutive Activity and Structural Instability of the Wild-type Human H2 receptor

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Stable expression of the human H2 receptor in Chinese hamster ovary cells resulted in an increase in basal cyclic AMP (cAMP) production, which was inhibited by the inverse agonists cimetidine, famotidine, and ranitidine with potencies similar to those found for the rat H2 receptor. Burimamide, a neutral antagonist at the rat H2 receptor, behaved as a weak partial agonist at the human H2 receptor. Burimamide competitively antagonized both the histamine‐induced increase in cAMP and the cimetidine‐induced reduction of the basal cAMP level with apparent KB values that were similar to its H2 receptor affinity. Investigation of the modulation of receptor expression after long‐term drug treatment revealed that at low concentrations histamine induced a significant reduction in H2 receptor expression, whereas at high concentrations receptor expression was slightly increased. The partial agonist burimamide induced, like inverse agonists, an upregulation of the human H2 receptor after prolonged treatment. These findings suggest a structural instability of the constitutively active human H2 receptor in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells. Occupation of the H2 receptor by any ligand reduces the instability, thus resulting in higher cellular expression levels.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)799-807
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Neurochemistry
    Volume71
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 1998

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutive Activity and Structural Instability of the Wild-type Human H2 receptor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this