Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Constrained Earth system models show a stronger reduction in future Northern Hemisphere snowmelt water

  • Yuanfang Chai
  • , Chiyuan Miao*
  • , Pierre Gentine
  • , Lawrence Mudryk
  • , Chad W. Thackeray
  • , Wouter R. Berghuijs
  • , Yi Wu
  • , Xuewei Fan
  • , Louise Slater
  • , Qiaohong Sun
  • , Francis Zwiers
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

81 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although Earth system models (ESMs) tend to overestimate historical land surface warming, they also overestimate snow amounts in the Northern Hemisphere. By combining ground-based datasets and ESMs, we find that this paradoxical phenomenon is predominantly driven by an overestimation of light snowfall frequency. Using spatially distributed emergent constraints, we show that this paradox persists in mid- (2041–2060) and long-term (2081–2100) projections, affecting more than half of the Northern Hemisphere’s land surface. ESMs underestimate the frequency of freezing days by 12–19% and overestimate snow water equivalent by 28–34%. Constrained projections indicate that the raw ESM outputs overestimate future Northern Hemisphere snowmelt water by 12–16% across 53–60% of the Northern Hemisphere’s land surface. This snowmelt water overprediction implies that the amount of water available in the future for agriculture, industry, ecosystems and domestic use may be lower than unadjusted ESM projections suggest.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbereaaz9549
Pages (from-to)514-520
Number of pages7
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume15
Issue number5
Early online date28 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2025.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Constrained Earth system models show a stronger reduction in future Northern Hemisphere snowmelt water'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this