Abstract
Consumption of raw or undercooked meat increases the risk of infection with Toxoplasma gondii. Freezing meat products can eliminate this risk. Freezing of meat may affect consumers' valuation of meat products in two different ways: it may be valued positively because of increased food safety or valued negatively because of (perceived) loss of quality. In a Discrete Choice Experiment on four different meat products we studied the difference in willingness to pay for frozen and non-frozen meat products in the Netherlands. Analyses revealed that most Dutch consumer groups prefer non-frozen meat. Price was important in consumer decisions, whereas the meat being frozen appeared to play a minor role in the decision to purchase meat products. Even though it may seem obvious that people would prefer safe food to unsafe food, in a context where consumers presume food being safe, many consumers appear unwilling to pay for freezing of meat as additional measure to reduce the risk of food borne infections such as toxoplasmosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Meat Science |
| Volume | 149 |
| Early online date | 5 Nov 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© 2018.Funding
This paper was funded by the RIVM (National Institute for Public health and the Environment) Strategic Research Program . The funding source had no influence on decisions in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation of the data.
| Funders |
|---|
| National Institute for Public Health |
| Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Consumers' preferences for freezing of meat to prevent toxoplasmosis– A stated preference approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver