Abstract
This article investigates how ambiguous constitutional design affected president-cabinet relations and constitutional change in post-communist Poland and Hungary. Constitutional provisions related to the prerogatives of presidents and governments were frequently subject to political conflict during the 1990s. The power struggle in the two cases developed and consolidated along two distinct pathways. In Poland, failed attempts to modify the constitution initially stirred up and extended intra-executive conflicts. With the adoption of a new constitution in 1997 the struggle over power between president and council of ministers was finally settled. In Hungary constitutional court rulings were instrumental in the settlement of president-cabinet conflicts. © 2009.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 83-101 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Communist an Post-Communist Studies: an international interdisciplinary journal |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contestable constitutions: Ambiguity, conflict, and change in East Central European dual executives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver