Contesting Pyrrhonian Contrastism

M.J. Blaauw

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

I air three kinds of problem to which Sinnott-Armstrong's epistemological contrastivism seems to be exposed: (a) the theory gives an unplausible account of justification attributions; (b) the Pyrrhonism which results from its inability to identify relevant contrast classes bars us from epistemic responsibility; (c) contextualism does just as well as Pyrrhonism, despite Sinnott-Armstrong's arguments to the contrary. © 2008 The Author.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)471-478
JournalPhilosophical Quarterly
Volume58
Issue number232
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contesting Pyrrhonian Contrastism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this