Abstract
I air three kinds of problem to which Sinnott-Armstrong's epistemological contrastivism seems to be exposed: (a) the theory gives an unplausible account of justification attributions; (b) the Pyrrhonism which results from its inability to identify relevant contrast classes bars us from epistemic responsibility; (c) contextualism does just as well as Pyrrhonism, despite Sinnott-Armstrong's arguments to the contrary. © 2008 The Author.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 471-478 |
Journal | Philosophical Quarterly |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 232 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |