Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures: Less annoying?

Kim White; Michael Arntzen; Adelbert Bronkhorst; Martijn Meeter

Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures: Less annoying?

Kim White, Michael Arntzen, Adelbert Bronkhorst, Martijn Meeter

Cognitive Psychology

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Annoyance reactions to different types of landing procedures were addressed in a controlled laboratory setting using a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS) with a head mounted display.Participants, standing on a virtual countryside road, experienced four types of descentflyovers by an A330 aircraft: A regular descent flyoverat 2000ft and CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000ft. These types of landing procedures are representative of flights approaching Amsterdam AirportSchiphol(AAS)in the Netherlands. Sound recordings for the VCNS were made on acountryside road and adjusted to match the indicated altitudes. After each flyover, participants were asked to rate their noise annoyance during the previous minute. Preliminary results showed that the 3000ft CDA was rated as the most annoying, followed by the ratings of the regular landing procedure and higher CDAs.These results could indicate that aCDA procedure, despite having lower LAmax and similar SEL levels, may still reach higher annoyance ratings due to longer flyover durations.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control
Publisher	Australian Acoustical Society
ISBN (Electronic)	9780909882037
Publication status	Published - 2014
Event	43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014 - Melbourne, Australia Duration: 16 Nov 2014 → 19 Nov 2014

Conference

Conference	43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014
Country/Territory	Australia
City	Melbourne
Period	16/11/14 → 19/11/14

Keywords

Continuousdescent approach
Noise annoyance
Virtual community noise simulator

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@inproceedings{167eb4f1ddc14f5f88bf2c9a3a961fb4,

title = "Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures: Less annoying?",

abstract = "Annoyance reactions to different types of landing procedures were addressed in a controlled laboratory setting using a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS) with a head mounted display.Participants, standing on a virtual countryside road, experienced four types of descentflyovers by an A330 aircraft: A regular descent flyoverat 2000ft and CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000ft. These types of landing procedures are representative of flights approaching Amsterdam AirportSchiphol(AAS)in the Netherlands. Sound recordings for the VCNS were made on acountryside road and adjusted to match the indicated altitudes. After each flyover, participants were asked to rate their noise annoyance during the previous minute. Preliminary results showed that the 3000ft CDA was rated as the most annoying, followed by the ratings of the regular landing procedure and higher CDAs.These results could indicate that aCDA procedure, despite having lower LAmax and similar SEL levels, may still reach higher annoyance ratings due to longer flyover durations.",

keywords = "Continuousdescent approach, Noise annoyance, Virtual community noise simulator",

author = "Kim White and Michael Arntzen and Adelbert Bronkhorst and Martijn Meeter",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

booktitle = "INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control",

publisher = "Australian Acoustical Society",

note = "43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014 ; Conference date: 16-11-2014 Through 19-11-2014",

}

White, K, Arntzen, M, Bronkhorst, A & Meeter, M 2014, Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures: Less annoying? in INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control. Australian Acoustical Society, 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014, Melbourne, Australia, 16/11/14.

Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures : Less annoying? / White, Kim; Arntzen, Michael; Bronkhorst, Adelbert et al.

INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control. Australian Acoustical Society, 2014.

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures

T2 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control, INTERNOISE 2014

AU - White, Kim

AU - Arntzen, Michael

AU - Bronkhorst, Adelbert

AU - Meeter, Martijn

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Annoyance reactions to different types of landing procedures were addressed in a controlled laboratory setting using a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS) with a head mounted display.Participants, standing on a virtual countryside road, experienced four types of descentflyovers by an A330 aircraft: A regular descent flyoverat 2000ft and CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000ft. These types of landing procedures are representative of flights approaching Amsterdam AirportSchiphol(AAS)in the Netherlands. Sound recordings for the VCNS were made on acountryside road and adjusted to match the indicated altitudes. After each flyover, participants were asked to rate their noise annoyance during the previous minute. Preliminary results showed that the 3000ft CDA was rated as the most annoying, followed by the ratings of the regular landing procedure and higher CDAs.These results could indicate that aCDA procedure, despite having lower LAmax and similar SEL levels, may still reach higher annoyance ratings due to longer flyover durations.

AB - Annoyance reactions to different types of landing procedures were addressed in a controlled laboratory setting using a Virtual Community Noise Simulator (VCNS) with a head mounted display.Participants, standing on a virtual countryside road, experienced four types of descentflyovers by an A330 aircraft: A regular descent flyoverat 2000ft and CDAs at respectively 3000, 4000 and 5000ft. These types of landing procedures are representative of flights approaching Amsterdam AirportSchiphol(AAS)in the Netherlands. Sound recordings for the VCNS were made on acountryside road and adjusted to match the indicated altitudes. After each flyover, participants were asked to rate their noise annoyance during the previous minute. Preliminary results showed that the 3000ft CDA was rated as the most annoying, followed by the ratings of the regular landing procedure and higher CDAs.These results could indicate that aCDA procedure, despite having lower LAmax and similar SEL levels, may still reach higher annoyance ratings due to longer flyover durations.

KW - Continuousdescent approach

KW - Noise annoyance

KW - Virtual community noise simulator

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923598263&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84923598263

BT - INTERNOISE 2014 - 43rd International Congress on Noise Control Engineering: Improving the World Through Noise Control

PB - Australian Acoustical Society

Y2 - 16 November 2014 through 19 November 2014

ER -

Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) compared to regular descent procedures: Less annoying?

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Handle.net

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this