Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis

Michael Beckmann, Katharina Gerstner, Morodoluwa Akin-Fajiye, Silvia Ceaușu, Stephan Kambach, Nicole L. Kinlock, Helen R.P. Phillips, Willem Verhagen, Jessica Gurevitch, Stefan Klotz, Tim Newbold, Peter H. Verburg, Marten Winter, Ralf Seppelt

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Most current research on land-use intensification addresses its potential to either threaten biodiversity or to boost agricultural production. However, little is known about the simultaneous effects of intensification on biodiversity and yield. To determine the responses of species richness and yield to conventional intensification, we conducted a global meta-analysis synthesizing 115 studies which collected data for both variables at the same locations. We extracted 449 cases that cover a variety of areas used for agricultural (crops, fodder) and silvicultural (wood) production. We found that, across all production systems and species groups, conventional intensification is successful in increasing yield (grand mean + 20.3%), but it also results in a loss of species richness (−8.9%). However, analysis of sub-groups revealed inconsistent results. For example, small intensification steps within low intensity systems did not affect yield or species richness. Within high-intensity systems species losses were non-significant but yield gains were substantial (+15.2%). Conventional intensification within medium intensity systems revealed the highest yield increase (+84.9%) and showed the largest loss in species richness (−22.9%). Production systems differed in their magnitude of richness response, with insignificant changes in silvicultural systems and substantial losses in crop systems (−21.2%). In addition, this meta-analysis identifies a lack of studies that collect robust biodiversity (i.e. beyond species richness) and yield data at the same sites and that provide quantitative information on land-use intensity. Our findings suggest that, in many cases, conventional land-use intensification drives a trade-off between species richness and production. However, species richness losses were often not significantly different from zero, suggesting even conventional intensification can result in yield increases without coming at the expense of biodiversity loss. These results should guide future research to close existing research gaps and to understand the circumstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agriculture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1941-1956
Number of pages16
JournalGlobal Change Biology
Volume25
Issue number6
Early online date9 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

meta-analysis
Land use
species richness
Biodiversity
land use
biodiversity
Crops
production system
Agriculture
crop
Wood
fodder
agricultural production
trade-off
loss
agriculture

Keywords

  • arable fields
  • biodiversity
  • conservation
  • crop production
  • forests
  • grasslands
  • green fodder
  • land management
  • wood production

Cite this

Beckmann, M., Gerstner, K., Akin-Fajiye, M., Ceaușu, S., Kambach, S., Kinlock, N. L., ... Seppelt, R. (2019). Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 25(6), 1941-1956. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14606
Beckmann, Michael ; Gerstner, Katharina ; Akin-Fajiye, Morodoluwa ; Ceaușu, Silvia ; Kambach, Stephan ; Kinlock, Nicole L. ; Phillips, Helen R.P. ; Verhagen, Willem ; Gurevitch, Jessica ; Klotz, Stefan ; Newbold, Tim ; Verburg, Peter H. ; Winter, Marten ; Seppelt, Ralf. / Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production : A global meta-analysis. In: Global Change Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 1941-1956.
@article{d6bc0535125f450ab064ff198ce76533,
title = "Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis",
abstract = "Most current research on land-use intensification addresses its potential to either threaten biodiversity or to boost agricultural production. However, little is known about the simultaneous effects of intensification on biodiversity and yield. To determine the responses of species richness and yield to conventional intensification, we conducted a global meta-analysis synthesizing 115 studies which collected data for both variables at the same locations. We extracted 449 cases that cover a variety of areas used for agricultural (crops, fodder) and silvicultural (wood) production. We found that, across all production systems and species groups, conventional intensification is successful in increasing yield (grand mean + 20.3{\%}), but it also results in a loss of species richness (−8.9{\%}). However, analysis of sub-groups revealed inconsistent results. For example, small intensification steps within low intensity systems did not affect yield or species richness. Within high-intensity systems species losses were non-significant but yield gains were substantial (+15.2{\%}). Conventional intensification within medium intensity systems revealed the highest yield increase (+84.9{\%}) and showed the largest loss in species richness (−22.9{\%}). Production systems differed in their magnitude of richness response, with insignificant changes in silvicultural systems and substantial losses in crop systems (−21.2{\%}). In addition, this meta-analysis identifies a lack of studies that collect robust biodiversity (i.e. beyond species richness) and yield data at the same sites and that provide quantitative information on land-use intensity. Our findings suggest that, in many cases, conventional land-use intensification drives a trade-off between species richness and production. However, species richness losses were often not significantly different from zero, suggesting even conventional intensification can result in yield increases without coming at the expense of biodiversity loss. These results should guide future research to close existing research gaps and to understand the circumstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agriculture.",
keywords = "arable fields, biodiversity, conservation, crop production, forests, grasslands, green fodder, land management, wood production",
author = "Michael Beckmann and Katharina Gerstner and Morodoluwa Akin-Fajiye and Silvia Ceaușu and Stephan Kambach and Kinlock, {Nicole L.} and Phillips, {Helen R.P.} and Willem Verhagen and Jessica Gurevitch and Stefan Klotz and Tim Newbold and Verburg, {Peter H.} and Marten Winter and Ralf Seppelt",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/gcb.14606",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1941--1956",
journal = "Global Change Biology",
issn = "1354-1013",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing",
number = "6",

}

Beckmann, M, Gerstner, K, Akin-Fajiye, M, Ceaușu, S, Kambach, S, Kinlock, NL, Phillips, HRP, Verhagen, W, Gurevitch, J, Klotz, S, Newbold, T, Verburg, PH, Winter, M & Seppelt, R 2019, 'Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis' Global Change Biology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1941-1956. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14606

Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production : A global meta-analysis. / Beckmann, Michael; Gerstner, Katharina; Akin-Fajiye, Morodoluwa; Ceaușu, Silvia; Kambach, Stephan; Kinlock, Nicole L.; Phillips, Helen R.P.; Verhagen, Willem; Gurevitch, Jessica; Klotz, Stefan; Newbold, Tim; Verburg, Peter H.; Winter, Marten; Seppelt, Ralf.

In: Global Change Biology, Vol. 25, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1941-1956.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production

T2 - A global meta-analysis

AU - Beckmann, Michael

AU - Gerstner, Katharina

AU - Akin-Fajiye, Morodoluwa

AU - Ceaușu, Silvia

AU - Kambach, Stephan

AU - Kinlock, Nicole L.

AU - Phillips, Helen R.P.

AU - Verhagen, Willem

AU - Gurevitch, Jessica

AU - Klotz, Stefan

AU - Newbold, Tim

AU - Verburg, Peter H.

AU - Winter, Marten

AU - Seppelt, Ralf

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Most current research on land-use intensification addresses its potential to either threaten biodiversity or to boost agricultural production. However, little is known about the simultaneous effects of intensification on biodiversity and yield. To determine the responses of species richness and yield to conventional intensification, we conducted a global meta-analysis synthesizing 115 studies which collected data for both variables at the same locations. We extracted 449 cases that cover a variety of areas used for agricultural (crops, fodder) and silvicultural (wood) production. We found that, across all production systems and species groups, conventional intensification is successful in increasing yield (grand mean + 20.3%), but it also results in a loss of species richness (−8.9%). However, analysis of sub-groups revealed inconsistent results. For example, small intensification steps within low intensity systems did not affect yield or species richness. Within high-intensity systems species losses were non-significant but yield gains were substantial (+15.2%). Conventional intensification within medium intensity systems revealed the highest yield increase (+84.9%) and showed the largest loss in species richness (−22.9%). Production systems differed in their magnitude of richness response, with insignificant changes in silvicultural systems and substantial losses in crop systems (−21.2%). In addition, this meta-analysis identifies a lack of studies that collect robust biodiversity (i.e. beyond species richness) and yield data at the same sites and that provide quantitative information on land-use intensity. Our findings suggest that, in many cases, conventional land-use intensification drives a trade-off between species richness and production. However, species richness losses were often not significantly different from zero, suggesting even conventional intensification can result in yield increases without coming at the expense of biodiversity loss. These results should guide future research to close existing research gaps and to understand the circumstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agriculture.

AB - Most current research on land-use intensification addresses its potential to either threaten biodiversity or to boost agricultural production. However, little is known about the simultaneous effects of intensification on biodiversity and yield. To determine the responses of species richness and yield to conventional intensification, we conducted a global meta-analysis synthesizing 115 studies which collected data for both variables at the same locations. We extracted 449 cases that cover a variety of areas used for agricultural (crops, fodder) and silvicultural (wood) production. We found that, across all production systems and species groups, conventional intensification is successful in increasing yield (grand mean + 20.3%), but it also results in a loss of species richness (−8.9%). However, analysis of sub-groups revealed inconsistent results. For example, small intensification steps within low intensity systems did not affect yield or species richness. Within high-intensity systems species losses were non-significant but yield gains were substantial (+15.2%). Conventional intensification within medium intensity systems revealed the highest yield increase (+84.9%) and showed the largest loss in species richness (−22.9%). Production systems differed in their magnitude of richness response, with insignificant changes in silvicultural systems and substantial losses in crop systems (−21.2%). In addition, this meta-analysis identifies a lack of studies that collect robust biodiversity (i.e. beyond species richness) and yield data at the same sites and that provide quantitative information on land-use intensity. Our findings suggest that, in many cases, conventional land-use intensification drives a trade-off between species richness and production. However, species richness losses were often not significantly different from zero, suggesting even conventional intensification can result in yield increases without coming at the expense of biodiversity loss. These results should guide future research to close existing research gaps and to understand the circumstances required to achieve such win-win or win-no-harm situations in conventional agriculture.

KW - arable fields

KW - biodiversity

KW - conservation

KW - crop production

KW - forests

KW - grasslands

KW - green fodder

KW - land management

KW - wood production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064046340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064046340&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/gcb.14606

DO - 10.1111/gcb.14606

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 1941

EP - 1956

JO - Global Change Biology

JF - Global Change Biology

SN - 1354-1013

IS - 6

ER -