Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence

Heleen A. Slagter

doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001

Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence

Heleen A. Slagter^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Short survey › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

A recent study by Redick and colleagues found no improvements in cognition or intelligence after working memory training using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Here, I argue that, although conventional training protocols may be ineffective, positive effects might be obtained when future research takes into account factors known to promote more general learning.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	582-583
Number of pages	2
Journal	Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume	16
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2012
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{fef77f6b3b41401b901fba3449f3c098,

title = "Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence",

abstract = "A recent study by Redick and colleagues found no improvements in cognition or intelligence after working memory training using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Here, I argue that, although conventional training protocols may be ineffective, positive effects might be obtained when future research takes into account factors known to promote more general learning.",

author = "Slagter, {Heleen A.}",

year = "2012",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "582--583",

journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",

issn = "1364-6613",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conventional working memory training may not improve intelligence

AU - Slagter, Heleen A.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - A recent study by Redick and colleagues found no improvements in cognition or intelligence after working memory training using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Here, I argue that, although conventional training protocols may be ineffective, positive effects might be obtained when future research takes into account factors known to promote more general learning.

AB - A recent study by Redick and colleagues found no improvements in cognition or intelligence after working memory training using a randomized, placebo-controlled design. Here, I argue that, although conventional training protocols may be ineffective, positive effects might be obtained when future research takes into account factors known to promote more general learning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869503225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869503225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.001

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 23089361

AN - SCOPUS:84869503225

VL - 16

SP - 582

EP - 583

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 12

ER -