Convergence between observations and interviews in clinical diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: A comprehensive approach is needed for diagnosing disordered attachment behavior due to the multifaceted nature of attachment. Differences between various indicators can pose a challenge for deciding on the proper diagnosis. This study assessed the convergence between clinical interview assessment and observation-based clinical diagnosis, and their linkages with inadequate care. Method: Participating children (N = 55) had intelligence quotients (IQs) between 50 and 85 and were referred for psychiatric consultation. Data were obtained by structured review of medical records, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview (DAI), and the Clinical Observation of Attachment (COA) procedure. Results: Of the 18 children identified using the DAI with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and/or disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED), only 7 received a clinical DSM-5 diagnosis of RAD and/or DSED. Observed maladaptive attachment behavior in the COA was strongly associated with DAI scores and with clinical diagnosis of DSM-5 RAD and/or DSED. There was a significantly higher prevalence of extremes of insufficient care in children who were classified with RAD by DAI or DSM-5 and/or with DSED by DSM-5 compared to those with no attachment disorder. Conclusions: Using structured observation and record assessment leads to more conservative identification of RAD or DSED than using the DAI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-619
Number of pages17
JournalClinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Reactive Attachment Disorder
Interviews
Observation
Child Care
Intelligence
Medical Records
Psychiatry
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • assessment
  • Attachment
  • disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED)
  • low average intellectual functioning
  • reactive attachment disorder (RAD)

Cite this

@article{cf714eab2e1a47fab8cecc23f8266256,
title = "Convergence between observations and interviews in clinical diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder",
abstract = "Objective: A comprehensive approach is needed for diagnosing disordered attachment behavior due to the multifaceted nature of attachment. Differences between various indicators can pose a challenge for deciding on the proper diagnosis. This study assessed the convergence between clinical interview assessment and observation-based clinical diagnosis, and their linkages with inadequate care. Method: Participating children (N = 55) had intelligence quotients (IQs) between 50 and 85 and were referred for psychiatric consultation. Data were obtained by structured review of medical records, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview (DAI), and the Clinical Observation of Attachment (COA) procedure. Results: Of the 18 children identified using the DAI with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and/or disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED), only 7 received a clinical DSM-5 diagnosis of RAD and/or DSED. Observed maladaptive attachment behavior in the COA was strongly associated with DAI scores and with clinical diagnosis of DSM-5 RAD and/or DSED. There was a significantly higher prevalence of extremes of insufficient care in children who were classified with RAD by DAI or DSM-5 and/or with DSED by DSM-5 compared to those with no attachment disorder. Conclusions: Using structured observation and record assessment leads to more conservative identification of RAD or DSED than using the DAI.",
keywords = "assessment, Attachment, disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED), low average intellectual functioning, reactive attachment disorder (RAD)",
author = "Giltaij, {Hans Peter} and Sterkenburg, {Paula Sophia} and Carlo Schuengel",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1359104517709049",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "603--619",
journal = "Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry",
issn = "1359-1045",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Convergence between observations and interviews in clinical diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder and disinhibited social engagement disorder

AU - Giltaij, Hans Peter

AU - Sterkenburg, Paula Sophia

AU - Schuengel, Carlo

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Objective: A comprehensive approach is needed for diagnosing disordered attachment behavior due to the multifaceted nature of attachment. Differences between various indicators can pose a challenge for deciding on the proper diagnosis. This study assessed the convergence between clinical interview assessment and observation-based clinical diagnosis, and their linkages with inadequate care. Method: Participating children (N = 55) had intelligence quotients (IQs) between 50 and 85 and were referred for psychiatric consultation. Data were obtained by structured review of medical records, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview (DAI), and the Clinical Observation of Attachment (COA) procedure. Results: Of the 18 children identified using the DAI with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and/or disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED), only 7 received a clinical DSM-5 diagnosis of RAD and/or DSED. Observed maladaptive attachment behavior in the COA was strongly associated with DAI scores and with clinical diagnosis of DSM-5 RAD and/or DSED. There was a significantly higher prevalence of extremes of insufficient care in children who were classified with RAD by DAI or DSM-5 and/or with DSED by DSM-5 compared to those with no attachment disorder. Conclusions: Using structured observation and record assessment leads to more conservative identification of RAD or DSED than using the DAI.

AB - Objective: A comprehensive approach is needed for diagnosing disordered attachment behavior due to the multifaceted nature of attachment. Differences between various indicators can pose a challenge for deciding on the proper diagnosis. This study assessed the convergence between clinical interview assessment and observation-based clinical diagnosis, and their linkages with inadequate care. Method: Participating children (N = 55) had intelligence quotients (IQs) between 50 and 85 and were referred for psychiatric consultation. Data were obtained by structured review of medical records, the Disturbances of Attachment Interview (DAI), and the Clinical Observation of Attachment (COA) procedure. Results: Of the 18 children identified using the DAI with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of reactive attachment disorder (RAD) and/or disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED), only 7 received a clinical DSM-5 diagnosis of RAD and/or DSED. Observed maladaptive attachment behavior in the COA was strongly associated with DAI scores and with clinical diagnosis of DSM-5 RAD and/or DSED. There was a significantly higher prevalence of extremes of insufficient care in children who were classified with RAD by DAI or DSM-5 and/or with DSED by DSM-5 compared to those with no attachment disorder. Conclusions: Using structured observation and record assessment leads to more conservative identification of RAD or DSED than using the DAI.

KW - assessment

KW - Attachment

KW - disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED)

KW - low average intellectual functioning

KW - reactive attachment disorder (RAD)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031411307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85031411307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1359104517709049

DO - 10.1177/1359104517709049

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 603

EP - 619

JO - Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

JF - Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry

SN - 1359-1045

IS - 4

ER -