Conversational framing in televised political discourse: A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy

A.J. Cienki, G. Giansante

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that 'populist' politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of 'fictive interaction' with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as 'populist' - Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi - with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic 'performance'. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
LanguageEnglish
Pages255-288
JournalJournal of Language and Politics
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

politician
Italy
election
discourse
colloquial
syntax
vocabulary
television
conversation
video
linguistics
Internet
simulation
interaction
interview
performance
Elections
Political Discourse
Politicians
Populist

Cite this

@article{0b2f80c16ffa4124aa93a075404c5990,
title = "Conversational framing in televised political discourse: A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy",
abstract = "The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that 'populist' politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of 'fictive interaction' with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as 'populist' - Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi - with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic 'performance'. {\circledC} John Benjamins Publishing Company.",
author = "A.J. Cienki and G. Giansante",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1075/jlp.13.2.04cie",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "255--288",
journal = "Journal of Language and Politics",
issn = "1569-2159",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conversational framing in televised political discourse: A comparison from the 2008 elections in the United States and Italy

AU - Cienki,A.J.

AU - Giansante,G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that 'populist' politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of 'fictive interaction' with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as 'populist' - Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi - with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic 'performance'. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

AB - The present study applies the notion of framing by examining how politicians may frame themselves as conversation partners with the audience, even in the virtual environment of television (and Internet video). The hypothesis is that 'populist' politicians are more likely than other kinds to frame their televised talk as a conversational encounter, given that this could facilitate mental simulation of 'fictive interaction' with their viewing audience. This study compares two national politicians in the U.S. and Italy known as 'populist' - Sarah Palin and Silvio Berlusconi - with their respective competitors: Joseph Biden and Walter Veltroni. For each speaker, a set of behaviours from televised debates or interviews in 2008 was analysed, including the use of pronouns, colloquial versus learned vocabulary, length of intonation units, syntax, and eye gaze and gesture. Consideration is given to the potential cognitive/affective consequences of framing in terms of conversational linguistic 'performance'. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

U2 - 10.1075/jlp.13.2.04cie

DO - 10.1075/jlp.13.2.04cie

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 255

EP - 288

JO - Journal of Language and Politics

T2 - Journal of Language and Politics

JF - Journal of Language and Politics

SN - 1569-2159

IS - 2

ER -