COP25 in Search of Lost Time for Action: An Assessment of the Madrid Climate Conference

W. Obergassel, C. Arens, C. Beuermann, L. Hermwille, N. Kreibich, H.E. Ott, M. Spitzner

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Last year's conference of the global climate change regime took place from 2 until 15 December 2019 in Madrid, Spain. Despite marking a new record for overtime in the history of the UNFCCC, the conference did not only fail to meet the increasing public demand for swift and strong climate action, it also failed on its formal mandate to finalise the Paris rulebook. A record number of issues were left unresolved and shelved for the next session. COP25 thereby highlighted how much work still lies ahead both domestically and internationally if 2020 is to see a step-up in climate action that is consistent with the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-17
Number of pages15
JournalCarbon and Climate Law Review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2020

Funding

The work plan finally agreed on only underscores the SCF’s contribution to the operational definitions of climate finance. In addition, it invites submissions on this issue by 30 April 2020, to assist the SCF in preparing its 2020 Biennial Assessment and Overview of Climate Finance Flows. Furthermore, the Decision encourages the SCF to present, ‘to the extent possible’, disaggregated information on climate finance flows and needs of developing coun- tries, including information on data availability and gaps by sector. On loss and damage, the Decision notes the inputs the SCF provided to the technical paper on sources of and modalities for accessing financial support for addressing loss and damage; and looks forward to future input from the WIM to the SCF on its work to develop draft guidance for the Green Climate Fund and the Global Environment Facility.41 Discussions on National Adaptation Plans (NAP) were taken up in plenary and informal consultations. Discussions focused on challenges in accessing financial resources for NAP formulation and implementation. In its decision34, the COP takes note of the Adaptation Committee’s work on gaps and needs and invites Parties to share information on activities to address gaps and needs. Developed countries were urged to mobilise support for adaptation activities in developing countries. The decision also notes challenges to access funding from the GCF Readiness and Preparatory Support Programme for the formulation of NAPs. SBI is requested to work further on gaps and needs and the implementation of NAPs.

FundersFunder number
Green Climate Fund
NAPs
Gastric Cancer Foundation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'COP25 in Search of Lost Time for Action: An Assessment of the Madrid Climate Conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this