Coping with noise in social dilemmas: Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions

Christopher P. Reinders Folmer, Tim Wildschut, David De Cremer, Paul A.M. van Lange

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Research on interindividual–intergroup discontinuity has illuminated distinct patterns of cognition, motivation, and behavior in interindividual versus intergroup contexts. However, it has examined these processes in laboratory environments with perfect transparency, whereas real-life interactions are often characterized by noise (i.e., misperceptions and unintended errors). This research compared interindividual and intergroup interactions in the presence or absence of noise. In a laboratory experiment, participants played 35 rounds of a dyadic give-some dilemma, in which they acted as individuals or group representatives. Noise was manipulated, such that players’ intentions either were perfectly translated into behavior or could deviate from their intentions in certain rounds (resulting in less cooperative behavior). Noise was more detrimental to cooperation in intergroup contexts than in interindividual contexts, because (a) participants who formed benign impressions of the other player coped better with noise, and (b) participants were less likely to form such benign impressions in intergroup than interindividual interactions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-214
Number of pages15
JournalGroup Processes and Intergroup Relations
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

social dilemma
Noise
pricing
coping
lack
Transparency
Group
interaction
cooperative behavior
laboratory experiment
Research
Experiments
Cognition
transparency
Cooperative Behavior
Motivation
cognition
Interaction
Intentions
Players

Keywords

  • cooperation
  • discontinuity effect
  • interdependence
  • intergroup conflict
  • noise
  • social dilemma

Cite this

@article{2ec0c698fd614f42b8ddc546e1cbf719,
title = "Coping with noise in social dilemmas: Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions",
abstract = "Research on interindividual–intergroup discontinuity has illuminated distinct patterns of cognition, motivation, and behavior in interindividual versus intergroup contexts. However, it has examined these processes in laboratory environments with perfect transparency, whereas real-life interactions are often characterized by noise (i.e., misperceptions and unintended errors). This research compared interindividual and intergroup interactions in the presence or absence of noise. In a laboratory experiment, participants played 35 rounds of a dyadic give-some dilemma, in which they acted as individuals or group representatives. Noise was manipulated, such that players’ intentions either were perfectly translated into behavior or could deviate from their intentions in certain rounds (resulting in less cooperative behavior). Noise was more detrimental to cooperation in intergroup contexts than in interindividual contexts, because (a) participants who formed benign impressions of the other player coped better with noise, and (b) participants were less likely to form such benign impressions in intergroup than interindividual interactions.",
keywords = "cooperation, discontinuity effect, interdependence, intergroup conflict, noise, social dilemma",
author = "{Reinders Folmer}, {Christopher P.} and Tim Wildschut and {De Cremer}, David and {van Lange}, {Paul A.M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1368430217722036",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "200--214",
journal = "Group Processes and Intergroup Relations",
issn = "1368-4302",
publisher = "Sage Publications",
number = "2",

}

Coping with noise in social dilemmas : Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions. / Reinders Folmer, Christopher P.; Wildschut, Tim; De Cremer, David; van Lange, Paul A.M.

In: Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 200-214.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coping with noise in social dilemmas

T2 - Group representatives fare worse than individuals because they lack trust in others’ benign intentions

AU - Reinders Folmer, Christopher P.

AU - Wildschut, Tim

AU - De Cremer, David

AU - van Lange, Paul A.M.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Research on interindividual–intergroup discontinuity has illuminated distinct patterns of cognition, motivation, and behavior in interindividual versus intergroup contexts. However, it has examined these processes in laboratory environments with perfect transparency, whereas real-life interactions are often characterized by noise (i.e., misperceptions and unintended errors). This research compared interindividual and intergroup interactions in the presence or absence of noise. In a laboratory experiment, participants played 35 rounds of a dyadic give-some dilemma, in which they acted as individuals or group representatives. Noise was manipulated, such that players’ intentions either were perfectly translated into behavior or could deviate from their intentions in certain rounds (resulting in less cooperative behavior). Noise was more detrimental to cooperation in intergroup contexts than in interindividual contexts, because (a) participants who formed benign impressions of the other player coped better with noise, and (b) participants were less likely to form such benign impressions in intergroup than interindividual interactions.

AB - Research on interindividual–intergroup discontinuity has illuminated distinct patterns of cognition, motivation, and behavior in interindividual versus intergroup contexts. However, it has examined these processes in laboratory environments with perfect transparency, whereas real-life interactions are often characterized by noise (i.e., misperceptions and unintended errors). This research compared interindividual and intergroup interactions in the presence or absence of noise. In a laboratory experiment, participants played 35 rounds of a dyadic give-some dilemma, in which they acted as individuals or group representatives. Noise was manipulated, such that players’ intentions either were perfectly translated into behavior or could deviate from their intentions in certain rounds (resulting in less cooperative behavior). Noise was more detrimental to cooperation in intergroup contexts than in interindividual contexts, because (a) participants who formed benign impressions of the other player coped better with noise, and (b) participants were less likely to form such benign impressions in intergroup than interindividual interactions.

KW - cooperation

KW - discontinuity effect

KW - interdependence

KW - intergroup conflict

KW - noise

KW - social dilemma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060724598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060724598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1368430217722036

DO - 10.1177/1368430217722036

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 200

EP - 214

JO - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

JF - Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

SN - 1368-4302

IS - 2

ER -