TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “On propagation of light in the vacuum between plates” [Phys. Lett. B 236 (1990) 354]
AU - Scharnhorst, K.
N1 - DOI of the original article: 10.1016/0370-2693(90)90997-K
PY - 2018/12/10
Y1 - 2018/12/10
N2 - The following corrections should be made to the original article: • P. 357, in the eqs. (17), (18) the symbols[Figure presented] and[Figure presented] should read correctly: F⊥ and [Formula presented], respectively.• P. 357, eq. (17): In this equation, the expressions[Figure presented] [Formula presented] and [Formula presented] should read correctly: [Formula presented] and [Formula presented], respectively [E1]. As a result, the definition of the function [Formula presented] changes (p. 358, eqs. (21), (22)).• P. 357, second line below of eq. (19): ‘This gives use’ should read correctly ‘This gives us’.• P. 358, eqs. (21), (22): The function [Formula presented] [Formula presented] should read correctly (cf. [E2], p. 560, eq. (7)): [Formula presented]• P. 358, eq. (26) should read correctly: [Formula presented] Correspondingly, on p. 359, second line from top: ‘[Formula presented]’ should read correctly ‘[Formula presented]’. Cf.: [E2], p. 561, eq. (9b) and [E3], p. 354, lines 2 and 3 from top.• Ref. [2] should read correctly: I.I. Abrikosova and B.V. Deryagin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31 (1956) 3.• In ref. [4], the volume number should read correctly: 170.
AB - The following corrections should be made to the original article: • P. 357, in the eqs. (17), (18) the symbols[Figure presented] and[Figure presented] should read correctly: F⊥ and [Formula presented], respectively.• P. 357, eq. (17): In this equation, the expressions[Figure presented] [Formula presented] and [Formula presented] should read correctly: [Formula presented] and [Formula presented], respectively [E1]. As a result, the definition of the function [Formula presented] changes (p. 358, eqs. (21), (22)).• P. 357, second line below of eq. (19): ‘This gives use’ should read correctly ‘This gives us’.• P. 358, eqs. (21), (22): The function [Formula presented] [Formula presented] should read correctly (cf. [E2], p. 560, eq. (7)): [Formula presented]• P. 358, eq. (26) should read correctly: [Formula presented] Correspondingly, on p. 359, second line from top: ‘[Formula presented]’ should read correctly ‘[Formula presented]’. Cf.: [E2], p. 561, eq. (9b) and [E3], p. 354, lines 2 and 3 from top.• Ref. [2] should read correctly: I.I. Abrikosova and B.V. Deryagin, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 31 (1956) 3.• In ref. [4], the volume number should read correctly: 170.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059615995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059615995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.physletb.2018.12.002
M3 - Comment / Letter to the editor
AN - SCOPUS:85059615995
SN - 0370-2693
VL - 787
SP - 204
JO - Physics Letters. Section B, Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics
JF - Physics Letters. Section B, Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics
ER -