Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial)

H.E. Bolkenstein, G.A. de Wit, E.C.J. Consten, B.J.M. Van de Wall, I.A.M.J. Broeders, W.A. Draaisma

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

© 2018 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons LtdBackground: The results of the DIRECT trial, an RCT comparing conservative management with elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurrent diverticulitis or persistent complaints, showed that elective sigmoid resection leads to higher quality of life. The aim of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment at 1- and 5-year follow-up from a societal perspective. Methods: Clinical effectiveness and resource use were derived from the DIRECT trial. The actual resource use and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L™ score) were documented prospectively per individual patient and analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle for up to 5 years after randomization. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Results: The study included 106 patients, of whom 50 were randomized to surgery and 56 to conservative treatment. At 1- and 5-year follow-up an incremental effect (QALY difference between groups) of 0·06 and 0·43 respectively was found, and an incremental cost (cost difference between groups) of €6957 and €2674 respectively, where surgery was more expensive than conservative treatment. This resulted in an ICER of €123 365 per additional QALY at 1-year follow-up, and €6275 at 5 years. At a threshold of €20 000 per QALY, operative treatment has 0 per cent probability of being cost-effective at 1-year follow-up, but a 95 per cent probability at 5 years. Conclusion: At 5-year follow-up, elective sigmoid resection in patients with recurring diverticulitis or persistent complaints was found to be cost-effective. Registration number: NTR1478 (www.trialregistrer.nl).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)448-457
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume106
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
Externally publishedYes

Funding

The authors thank the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) for supplying the grant (171002201) that made this trial possible. They also thank all staff of the participating hospitals of the DIRECT trial for their efforts, and especially the patients for their participation. The DIRECT trial is part of a national consortium, the Dutch Diverticular Disease Collaborative Study group. This group consists of researchers of the Ladies, DIABOLO and DIRECT trials (three diverticulitis trials in the Netherlands). The trial was registered with trialregistrer.nl (number NTR1478) on 20 September 2008, with an analysis plan before conducting the research. The preregistration adheres to the disclosure requirements of the institutional registry. Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

FundersFunder number
Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
ZonMw171002201

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this