Cost-Effectiveness and Return-on-Investment of the Dynamic Work Intervention Compared With Usual Practice to Reduce Sedentary Behavior

Ângela Jornada Ben*, Judith G M Jelsma, Lidewij R. Renaud, Maaike A. Huysmans, Femke van Nassau, Allard J. Van Der Beek, Hidde P. Van Der Ploeg, Hanneke van Dongen, Judith E. Bosmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective:
To assess the cost-effectiveness and return-on-investment (ROI) of the Dynamic Work (DW) Intervention, a worksite intervention aimed at reducing sitting time among office workers.

Methods:
In total, 244 workers were randomized to the intervention or control group. Overall sitting time, standing time, step counts, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs were measured over 12 months. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the societal perspective and the ROI analysis from the employers’ perspective.

Results:
No significant differences in effects and societal costs were observed between groups. Presenteeism costs were significantly lower in the intervention group. The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 0.90 at a willingness-to-pay of 20,000€/QALY. The probability of financial savings was 0.86.

Conclusion:
The intervention may be considered cost-effective from the societal perspective depending on the willingness-to-pay. From the employer perspective, the intervention seems cost-beneficial.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jun 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-Effectiveness and Return-on-Investment of the Dynamic Work Intervention Compared With Usual Practice to Reduce Sedentary Behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this